General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I don't give a shit about Rand Paul, or Obama's political standing, or House GOP motivations. [View all]creeksneakers2
(7,990 posts)I believe you that it has happened. I just wonder how much.
I ran a site search for the word "paul-bot" and browsed a couple of pages of links. (Too many to search under "Paul" that weren't relevant.) Most of the times the word "Paul-bot" was used were to describe Edward Snowden, who is a Ron Paul fan. The next most frequent category was people complaining about being called Paul-bots. There were references to actual Paul supporters as Paul-bots. I didn't run across any individual being called a Paul-bot but found a couple of times where the side that usually opposes Obama was called Paul-bots.
While I agree that you are not a Paul supporter and that its stupid to be for something just because Republicans are against it, I wonder why after complaining about being wrongly insulted for your beliefs that you go on to describe those who support the attack with "The hyper-authoritarian impulse to support WHATEVER THE BOSS SAYS NO MATTER WHAT WHAAARGARBLE ."
Isn't this all another case of two sides making unjust characterizations of each other? I also think this OP is a case of exaggerated victim hood. If somebody calls somebody or a side "Paul-bot" why not challenge it on that thread? Re-raising the issue just escalates the fighting.
By the way, I usually support Obama but I think the proposed attack on Syria is a terrible and potentially dangerous idea.