Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'Crack baby' study ends with unexpected but clear result [View all]Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)27. kick
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This is an honest researcher, to go where the data leads. "Poverty is a more powerful influence...
Hekate
Sep 2013
#1
Not really--over half the participants aren't accounted for, and when you eliminate preemies from
msanthrope
Sep 2013
#6
I agree. Crack babies are more likely to be born prematurely so it skews the data
pnwmom
Sep 2013
#26
Illicit drug use, alcohol & tobacco, are significant risk factors for pre-term delivery and
msanthrope
Sep 2013
#29
What happened to the other half of the kids in the original study? If you started with 224, but
msanthrope
Sep 2013
#5
Well, one expects answers to easy questions in the study itself. I find the whole "crack baby"
msanthrope
Sep 2013
#12
One is expected to provide proof of one's questions? That's an awfully authoritarian
msanthrope
Sep 2013
#14
Wait, what? I am a bully now? For asking questions? Somebody better tell Hekate below that she is
msanthrope
Sep 2013
#17
It's possible some would question my motivations for asking said questions. Fair enough, but
msanthrope
Sep 2013
#25
Good question--but sometimes subjects move away or drop out. It is voluntary, after all....
Hekate
Sep 2013
#9
Oh--I agree that "crack baby" was as valid as "welfare queen" but what I am wondering about
msanthrope
Sep 2013
#11
Yeah--but the kids we are discussing are 25 plus years old, not part of the current
msanthrope
Sep 2013
#18
You can probably track down other studies that specifically target them. Researchers really do want
Hekate
Sep 2013
#19
You bring up a good point about "level of exposure." Other than a blood test
msanthrope
Sep 2013
#21
Not surprising at all. One of the constants we see with the rapid advancement of scientific
Egalitarian Thug
Sep 2013
#7
Poverty and unemployment are the worst drugs of all, drugs forced onto the poor.
ck4829
Sep 2013
#47