General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I don't give a shit about Rand Paul, or Obama's political standing, or House GOP motivations. [View all]1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)if not agree with, many of your policy positions; however, on the topic of whether the US should respond to Assad's use of chemical weapons by launching cruise missiles, we disagree. That's cool ... but I would ask that you consider ... deeply consider ... what if you are wrong?
Would your opposition change, if you actually had something to lose if you were wrong?
Would your opposition to US intervention differ, if you or your loved ones were potential victims of Assad's next chemical attack?
It doesn't take much or particular courage to loudly proclaim a position when you have nothing at stake.
Editted to add: This OP was not really directed to you, in particular; but rather to everyone that has staked out the no invention stance. We all can stake out positions BECAUSE in the end ... we have no price to pay if we are wrong. We can just walk passed our "Oops" and dash to our next outrage ... which for many, should the US not act and Assad (or some other nation with WMD capacity) use chemical weapons, will be "Look at the carnage ... why didn't the US act?"