Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Kerry: We have to attack Syria or the rebel forces will gain strength. Er, what? [View all]karynnj
(60,997 posts)24. You are smarter than this - Kerry is referring to the AQ extremists, not to ALL rebels
Kerry - and everyone else has spoken of the fact that there are many different groups all - for their own reason - fighting Assad. A concern of the US is that one of them is the AQ connected rebels in that video.
Putin took the opposite approach in attacking Kerry - suggesting that he said there were no AQ in Syria, when he even when asked to gave an estimate of the percent they were of the total.
It is entirely possible if people who hate Assad because of his actions - including gassing and shelling their suburbs - see no alternative leaders other than the AQ group, that group will expand. The US pulling back could also lead many moderates to flee as refugees.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Kerry: We have to attack Syria or the rebel forces will gain strength. Er, what? [View all]
cali
Sep 2013
OP
That's right up there with "he has to destroy the village to save the village."
David__77
Sep 2013
#3
k&r Let us bomb or we will fund 'rebels', INCLUDING AQ? Is that what he is actually said?
idwiyo
Sep 2013
#5
"more extremists will be attracted to this" - not what you've mangled into your OP title.
Bolo Boffin
Sep 2013
#7
oh fucking please. It's exactly what I said and it's digusting bullshit for that man
cali
Sep 2013
#8
No, it is not, and your distracting and doubling-down defense of it is what's disgusting here.
Bolo Boffin
Sep 2013
#12
After reading your explanation I agree with Cali. The title of the OP is correct.
idwiyo
Sep 2013
#26
You're wrong, too. The rebels are not all extremists. Kerry is clearly making that distinction. n/t
Bolo Boffin
Sep 2013
#29
Ahhhh, those ellusive 'moderate rebels' that only Kerry knows about. Those ones...
idwiyo
Sep 2013
#36
The OP mangles what John Kerry said in a cheap shot at him. That should make no one proud. n/t
Bolo Boffin
Sep 2013
#41
The confusion may be that some equate "rebels" with "extremists", while the other poster
pampango
Sep 2013
#22
You are smarter than this - Kerry is referring to the AQ extremists, not to ALL rebels
karynnj
Sep 2013
#24
His point is if the US drops support of the moderates - (ie "turns its back"), then the
karynnj
Sep 2013
#28
Decisions ...decisions ...which terrorist group to help out? Hezbollah or Al-Nusra?
L0oniX
Sep 2013
#34
Kerry is right about the worst elements of the rebels gaining strength if nothing is done
bluestate10
Sep 2013
#46