Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If Pres. Obama is a tool of PNAC and the MIC, why did they try so hard to keep him out of office... [View all]Myrina
(12,296 posts)22. Who says they did?
The GOP & their candidates are pretty much about one thing: makin' money.
The best way to make that cash is to gin up your followers into such a blind frenzy that they sign over the farm.
And the best way to do that is to make it look like the other candidate is a baby-killin, crack smokin' Communist straight from Hell itself. Or Kenya, in this case.
So your cronies are rakin' in the cash, your base is oblivious to the fact that you're using them for cash and cash alone, and your horse wins regardless, because you actually own the entire stable.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If Pres. Obama is a tool of PNAC and the MIC, why did they try so hard to keep him out of office... [View all]
brooklynite
Sep 2013
OP
I take it you are not a student of the techniques of the confidence men
Vinnie From Indy
Sep 2013
#4
One thing the PNACers don't want to see is just what Obama did: call for a vote
kelliekat44
Sep 2013
#5
Exactly. Remember WW II when we had 2 Democratic Presidents who actually wanted to end a war?
AnotherMcIntosh
Sep 2013
#43
The third party panderers want..nay..NEED to push false equivalencies.
great white snark
Sep 2013
#14
Truth is complicated, he like most modern politicians "works for" many bosses, each with a differing
Dragonfli
Sep 2013
#39
Did they? I'm not part of their circle, so I don't know that your testimony is correct.
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#21
The MIC wouldn't let anyone into the Presidency that they didn't have the goods on.
FarCenter
Sep 2013
#23
What many at DU don't understand is those with good intentions are more dangerous
geek tragedy
Sep 2013
#24
The contemporary office of the President of the United States is a tool of PNAC and MIC.....
marmar
Sep 2013
#25
I'd rather use the correct size wrench to do a job...but a pair of pliers works too.
The Link
Sep 2013
#36
False premise. If a candidate is "viable" then they are acceptable to these folks.
TheKentuckian
Sep 2013
#49
"they" ran mccain and romney. doesn't seem that "they" really put forth much effort at all..
frylock
Sep 2013
#50
Just for curiosities sake, who did you support for pres last election? ETA, FRP.
uppityperson
Sep 2013
#53