Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

spooky3

(34,456 posts)

2. Because

Reply to TNNurse (Original post)

Sat Feb 13, 2021, 06:57 PM

Feb 2021

(A) many witnesses were too fearful and Dems couldn’t know in advance what they would say under oath

(B) Trump’s lawyers stipulated that the one witness statement was true

(C) they had a strong case without them.

Per Eric Swalwell.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Did not watch today, [View all] TNNurse Feb 2021 OP

Basically, the Trump counsel would have turned it into a shitshow of epic proportions... Wounded Bear Feb 2021 #1

Thanks, I suspected something like that from a headline. TNNurse Feb 2021 #4

The other comments below are accurate also...nt Wounded Bear Feb 2021 #6

Because spooky3 Feb 2021 #2

Mostly true, however . . . euphorb Feb 2021 #7

The Republicans did not challenge its veracity or spooky3 Feb 2021 #8

A few reasons soothsayer Feb 2021 #3

Thanks to you all. TNNurse Feb 2021 #5