Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So the Sequester is just another SCAM too? [View all]Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)6. Can't cut defense, ya know.
And can't touch those oil depletion allowances.
From March--
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/03/01/1654501/oil-subsidies-century/
Automatic across-the-board budget cuts will take hold on Friday, affecting job growth, state education programs, environmental agencies, and womens health programs. The sequester actually shares an important anniversary with Big Oil tax breaks. It is not as well-known a date, but one type of deduction, the percentage depletion allowance, celebrates its 100-year anniversary today.
Depletion allowances let oil companies treat the oil in the ground as capital equipment, and thus allows them to write off a certain percentage for each barrel that comes out. (See more here.)
The year 1913 marked the first time a Big Oil subsidy was written into the tax code. The Revenue Act of 1913 allowed oil companies to write off 5 percent of the costs from oil and gas wells beginning March 1 of that year. (For reference, see pages 172-174 of the Act.) A century later, oil companies can now deduct three times this rate, at 15 percent, although the very largest companies no longer qualify. The percentage depletion subsidy also increases when prices are high, at the same time that oil companies enjoy greater profit. It can even eliminate all federal taxes for independent producers.
A Center for American Progress report estimated that closing this tax break would save $11.2 billion over 10 years.
Depletion allowances let oil companies treat the oil in the ground as capital equipment, and thus allows them to write off a certain percentage for each barrel that comes out. (See more here.)
The year 1913 marked the first time a Big Oil subsidy was written into the tax code. The Revenue Act of 1913 allowed oil companies to write off 5 percent of the costs from oil and gas wells beginning March 1 of that year. (For reference, see pages 172-174 of the Act.) A century later, oil companies can now deduct three times this rate, at 15 percent, although the very largest companies no longer qualify. The percentage depletion subsidy also increases when prices are high, at the same time that oil companies enjoy greater profit. It can even eliminate all federal taxes for independent producers.
A Center for American Progress report estimated that closing this tax break would save $11.2 billion over 10 years.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Everybody hates congress but everybody loves their congressmen. As long as they're bringing home
Ed Suspicious
Sep 2013
#41
I have been saying this for awhile, Republican & Democratic politicians are like the
Dustlawyer
Sep 2013
#9
The Economic REALITY of Life for the Working Class in the New American Century...
bvar22
Sep 2013
#11
I felt like I was seeing a similar con during the single payer health care debate.
GoneFishin
Sep 2013
#13
The Public Option wasn't possible when the ACA was being debated. The ACA will erode
bluestate10
Sep 2013
#29
I hope you are right. One thing is for sure, the republicans all have loads in their pants
GoneFishin
Sep 2013
#87
Don't you wish the President & Party Leadership had fought as hard for a Public Option...
bvar22
Sep 2013
#63
Actually, there's no money for hundreds or thousands of cruise missiles. We'll have to
Flatulo
Sep 2013
#15
Actually I think he has the responsibility to not make things worse......
socialist_n_TN
Sep 2013
#37
Bullshit. The consequences would NOT have been "...immediate and permanent.".........
socialist_n_TN
Sep 2013
#46
Well now you are left making the Republican argument from 2011, I'll leave you to it.
tritsofme
Sep 2013
#52
Funny how the "far Left" is always proven correct in their theories......
socialist_n_TN
Sep 2013
#32
Yep. As a lot of us have noted, and not just the Classic Reds, but........
socialist_n_TN
Sep 2013
#74
Yes...they tried to stage a coup in the '30s with Smedley Butler as their figurehead
deutsey
Sep 2013
#75
When the deck is stacked against you, it is foolish not to suspect a conspiracy.
AdHocSolver
Sep 2013
#33
It really wasn't that complicated. The only players were the Republicans who took over the House
tritsofme
Sep 2013
#42
I think we are overusing the CT card. I dont think the OP means there is a "master plan"
rhett o rick
Sep 2013
#76
Sure it was a scam. The capitalists wanted austerity and they got it.....
socialist_n_TN
Sep 2013
#38
Yes I agree with the critical mass comment. And I dont think it can end good.
rhett o rick
Sep 2013
#83