Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'd be fine with posting on Syria's Facebook page. Katashi_itto Sep 2013 #1
Surprised he would go there, since we have war criminals of our own... polichick Sep 2013 #2
Sounds sane and reasonable. avaistheone1 Sep 2013 #3
The proposal up in the OP is from a Republican, the one down below is by two Democrats... Tx4obama Sep 2013 #4
The Republican proposal is best because it involves other nations... polichick Sep 2013 #5
Why not try both? nt AverageJoe90 Sep 2013 #7
They've had 20 years to sign this thing but still hang with North Korea as... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #10
Using chemical weapons aren't the only crime against humanity. dkf Sep 2013 #12
My guess is that if one of them is allowed a to get a vote then the other one will be too. Tx4obama Sep 2013 #14
TBH, the only reason I can trust Rep.Smith is because he's actually served on a few of these before. AverageJoe90 Sep 2013 #6
But he's a REPUBLICAN. sibelian Sep 2013 #8
Good idea, but how long is THAT going to take... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #9
The house gopers won't go with neither Iliyah Sep 2013 #11
He must have read my post. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #13
I like both that idea davidpdx Sep 2013 #15
Is it okay by international law to force someone to sign a treaty? dkf Sep 2013 #16
No, they have the option of not signing it davidpdx Sep 2013 #17
Just think if all treaties got signatories like that. dkf Sep 2013 #18
The problem with sanctions is that it is the people that suffer, not the rulers. RC Sep 2013 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is there an alternative t...»Reply #3