General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If he had fought this hard for Single-Payer... [View all]enlightenment
(8,830 posts)Not because it should be, but because that is what our system has made it.
A huge part of the problem, is word parsing (which is tossing a political football). You define "single-payer" in one way - when in truth it most certainly does include systems like the NHS. What is done with the funds after they are pooled is what separates most of the systems.
We don't have to have an NHS system full-stop, but we have got to move away from the idea of including for-profit health insurance corporations in the equation. The ACA encodes their participation in a way that ensures we will never locate that "back door" you keep talking about.
It's nice to believe that "other states" will follow Vermont's lead (which is a pooled insurance scheme) - but that is less than realistic and suggests that you really don't know as much as you think you do. If you're an expert, post your credentials - but please don't think that anyone should accept your pronouncements as deeply informed when they clearly are not.