Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bhikkhu

(10,789 posts)
13. That's not its purpose, of course
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 02:39 PM
Sep 2013

but the devil is in the details. Its easy to argue that trade agreements can benefit both parties, and that that is the intent of most trade agreements, but unintended consequences may be the rule there (if the history of that sort of thing is a good measure).

And I do share the concern that some of the parties involved in the drafting (corporate interests) really don't care about any party to the trade agreement as much as they care about their own bottom line. It all comes down to the text of the agreement, and whether all the consequences can be clearly worked out before congress has the opportunity to ratify, or not.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I agree gopiscrap Sep 2013 #1
K&R abelenkpe Sep 2013 #2
sorry Charlie, $$$ is for banksters and endless war phantom power Sep 2013 #3
Good one! nt Enthusiast Sep 2013 #18
endless job security for the MIC welfare crowd -does that count as a war against joblessness? nt msongs Sep 2013 #4
A Global War on Greed. Better marketing and, since it's now September, we HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #5
Tell it to the GOP, Rangel. They're blocking all the progress. -nt CakeGrrl Sep 2013 #6
The rich must get richer. jsr Sep 2013 #7
Congress could still pass the American Jobs Act bhikkhu Sep 2013 #8
Whether Congress passes the American Jobs Act or not, Obama is still planning to sign the TPP AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2013 #11
That's not its purpose, of course bhikkhu Sep 2013 #13
"Maximizing shareholder profit" is the purpose, which means shipping jobs to foreign countries. AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2013 #14
Jobs aren't always better done in other countries bhikkhu Sep 2013 #16
The logic of the Chicago School of Economics has proven to be a failure. AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2013 #17
No shit....nt Enthusiast Sep 2013 #20
Bwahaha! Hell will freeze over first. nt valerief Sep 2013 #9
If Obama wanted to reduce joblessness, he would have kept his NAFTA-related campaign promise, AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2013 #10
Zactly.........nt Enthusiast Sep 2013 #21
The big spike in oil prices is going to crash the global economy in short order. Brace yourselves. Coyotl Sep 2013 #12
It's all in the framing. randome Sep 2013 #15
K and R (nt) bigwillq Sep 2013 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rangel: Let's Fight a War...»Reply #13