Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
4. You really want to know?
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 05:58 PM
Sep 2013

Bush could have called for an invasion of Malaysia and so long as his administration showed photographs of minarets and people at prayer, the US public would have gulped down whatever other nonsense he had to offer.

it wasn't a slip when he called it a "crusade," though perhaps he didn't intend it. no, Americans are well-simmered in the rhetoric of "clash of civilizations" and as we see ourselves as the pinnacle of achievement in "The West" we seem to consider it a vital duty to continue the work of crusaders past.

That there are numerous propaganda operations lobbying on behalf of a nation that happens to benefit from the utter bestialization of Arabs and Muslims in the US also contributes - a one-sided story where people who practice Islam can only ever be these evil, loathsome creatures who must be opposed, defeated, and destroyed at all costs. Hell, we just had an example of this on DU a few weeks ago, where people were literally cheering the slaughter of Egyptians in the streets of Cairo "because they're Islamist." This, on DU, a supposed bulwark of liberalism.

If it weren't for twelve years of unproductive war causing emotional exhaustion in Americans, I imagine the public would be falling over itself to not just bomb Syria but to invade it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Is it all about who the media supports? Yes. arcane1 Sep 2013 #1
The media found out in 1991 that war = $$$ hughee99 Sep 2013 #9
except now. Funny that. LaydeeBug Sep 2013 #19
Times have changed PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #2
We were attacked Politicalboi Sep 2013 #3
You really want to know? Scootaloo Sep 2013 #4
For one thing, Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein carried a lot of weight in the US Senate. truedelphi Sep 2013 #5
I never understood why Bush was supported, but I remember back then, it was like Cleita Sep 2013 #6
W had plenty of GOP yes boys in Congress who were big hawks and gave W everything he wanted. Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #7
Not true, unfortunately. About 50-60% of Americans polled in March '03 supported the invasion leveymg Sep 2013 #8
That's what I couldn't remember, how the majority felt. rainy Sep 2013 #17
Most of us were not against it. Avalux Sep 2013 #10
Because the lapdog press was kissing his ass. KittyWampus Sep 2013 #11
I think it's because it was still only about 1.5 years after 9/11. PlanetaryOrbit Sep 2013 #12
Those who did have the courage (mostly Dems) to vote against mountain grammy Sep 2013 #13
Because Bush/Cheney was going to war anyway and everyone knew it. Precisely Sep 2013 #14
The Dem congresscritters feared wingnut slander against them more than they listened to constituents UTUSN Sep 2013 #15
9/11. Period. nt Pale Blue Dot Sep 2013 #16
my LOCAL news did three minutes on the 'nationwide protests' spanone Sep 2013 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How was it that with the ...»Reply #4