Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
5. For one thing, Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein carried a lot of weight in the US Senate.
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 05:59 PM
Sep 2013

And boy oh boy did she ever want that war.

And due to how Feinstein had re-written the entire ethics code that once had offered some protection for the average US citizens from elected officials' predatory rampages against both the national treasury and the nation's service people, she knew if she could convince enough other "D" Senators to vote for the Iraq War Resolution, (IWR) then she would have it made in the shade until she was in the grave.

Within six months of our "Shock and Awe" attack on the people of Iraq, her husband, Richard Blum, had earned up to 27 million dollars of profit. Oh to be a contractor, married to a powerful woman senator! And to know that most of the time, a person didn't have to even fulfill the war contracts, as when the work is supposed to happen inside a nation where everything is being blown up, well, who cares?

By the end of the our involvement in the Iraq War, Feinstein/Blum had over 750 millions of dolalrs of war contracts! Often Feinstein's ability to have hearings in which war generals testified as to the future projections of the military in Iraq, allowed the couple insider access to information as to what was going to be need in terms of Iraq "re-construction" efforts and also war necessities.

If you consider that many of our trusted and elected "public servants" in the House have just as much greed inside their soulless life forms as Feinstein does, and you have your answer.

Meanwhile, those who voted against the IWR, like Congresswoman Barbara Lee, had to defend themselves against death threats!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Is it all about who the media supports? Yes. arcane1 Sep 2013 #1
The media found out in 1991 that war = $$$ hughee99 Sep 2013 #9
except now. Funny that. LaydeeBug Sep 2013 #19
Times have changed PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #2
We were attacked Politicalboi Sep 2013 #3
You really want to know? Scootaloo Sep 2013 #4
For one thing, Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein carried a lot of weight in the US Senate. truedelphi Sep 2013 #5
I never understood why Bush was supported, but I remember back then, it was like Cleita Sep 2013 #6
W had plenty of GOP yes boys in Congress who were big hawks and gave W everything he wanted. Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #7
Not true, unfortunately. About 50-60% of Americans polled in March '03 supported the invasion leveymg Sep 2013 #8
That's what I couldn't remember, how the majority felt. rainy Sep 2013 #17
Most of us were not against it. Avalux Sep 2013 #10
Because the lapdog press was kissing his ass. KittyWampus Sep 2013 #11
I think it's because it was still only about 1.5 years after 9/11. PlanetaryOrbit Sep 2013 #12
Those who did have the courage (mostly Dems) to vote against mountain grammy Sep 2013 #13
Because Bush/Cheney was going to war anyway and everyone knew it. Precisely Sep 2013 #14
The Dem congresscritters feared wingnut slander against them more than they listened to constituents UTUSN Sep 2013 #15
9/11. Period. nt Pale Blue Dot Sep 2013 #16
my LOCAL news did three minutes on the 'nationwide protests' spanone Sep 2013 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How was it that with the ...»Reply #5