Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UTUSN

(77,318 posts)
15. The Dem congresscritters feared wingnut slander against them more than they listened to constituents
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 07:20 PM
Sep 2013

Shrub's string-pullers CHEENEE-Rums had 30-40 yrs' experience in government behind the scenes trickery. They knew the Draft was a major fuel of the Vietnam protests, so they knocked that out from the get-go. But the major thing was 9-11, including the humiliation and the perception that something/anything had to be revenge, and the Selectee head of government could hardly be shunned in a time of crisis. Mostly cowardice from Dems and the built-in incompetence in the government oversight apparatus.

As for "the largest protested war ever", hmmm. Maybe worldwide, with some state organization.

*********QUOTE********

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_against_the_Iraq_War

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[font size=5]Protests against the Iraq War[/font]

Beginning in 2002, and continuing after the 2003 invasion of Iraq, large-scale protests against the Iraq War were held in many cities worldwide, often coordinated to occur simultaneously around the world. After the biggest series of demonstrations, on February 15, 2003, New York Times writer Patrick Tyler claimed that they showed that there were two superpowers on the planet, the United States and worldwide public opinion.[1]

These demonstrations against the war were mainly organized by anti-war organizations, many of whom had been formed in opposition to the invasion of Afghanistan. In some Arab countries demonstrations were organized by the state. Europe saw the biggest mobilization of protesters, including a rally of three million people in Rome, which is listed in the Guinness Book of Records as the largest ever anti-war rally.[2]

According to the French academic Dominique Reynié, between January 3 and April 12, 2003, 36 million people across the globe took part in almost 3,000 protests against the Iraq war.[3] ....

[font size=5]Scope and impact in the United States[/font]

A March 2003 Gallup poll conducted during the first few days of the war showed that 5% of the population had protested or made a public opposition against the war compared to 21% who attended a rally or made a public display to support the war.[6] An ABC news poll showed that 2% had attended an anti-war protest and 1% attended a pro-war rally. The protests made 20% more opposed to the war and 7% more supportive.[7] A Fox News poll showed that 63% had an unfavorable view of the protesters, just 23% had a favorable view.[7] According to Pew Research, 40% said in March 2003 that they had heard "too much" from people opposed to the war against 17% who said "too little".[8]

Some observers have noted that the protests against the Iraq war have been relatively small-scale and infrequent compared to protests against the Vietnam War. One of the most often cited factors for this is the lack of conscription.[9][10]

*************UNQUOTE*************

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Is it all about who the media supports? Yes. arcane1 Sep 2013 #1
The media found out in 1991 that war = $$$ hughee99 Sep 2013 #9
except now. Funny that. LaydeeBug Sep 2013 #19
Times have changed PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #2
We were attacked Politicalboi Sep 2013 #3
You really want to know? Scootaloo Sep 2013 #4
For one thing, Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein carried a lot of weight in the US Senate. truedelphi Sep 2013 #5
I never understood why Bush was supported, but I remember back then, it was like Cleita Sep 2013 #6
W had plenty of GOP yes boys in Congress who were big hawks and gave W everything he wanted. Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #7
Not true, unfortunately. About 50-60% of Americans polled in March '03 supported the invasion leveymg Sep 2013 #8
That's what I couldn't remember, how the majority felt. rainy Sep 2013 #17
Most of us were not against it. Avalux Sep 2013 #10
Because the lapdog press was kissing his ass. KittyWampus Sep 2013 #11
I think it's because it was still only about 1.5 years after 9/11. PlanetaryOrbit Sep 2013 #12
Those who did have the courage (mostly Dems) to vote against mountain grammy Sep 2013 #13
Because Bush/Cheney was going to war anyway and everyone knew it. Precisely Sep 2013 #14
The Dem congresscritters feared wingnut slander against them more than they listened to constituents UTUSN Sep 2013 #15
9/11. Period. nt Pale Blue Dot Sep 2013 #16
my LOCAL news did three minutes on the 'nationwide protests' spanone Sep 2013 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How was it that with the ...»Reply #15