General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: My son, whose first-ever vote was for Obama, now thinks Ron Paul looks better. [View all]Ferret Annica
(1,701 posts)... without getting posts deleted or wind up getting banned.
A Ron Paul would be limited by what he could pass because so much opposition in Congress exists to his agenda, and his refreshing honesty,ethical and honest nature is like a breath of fresh air to some feeling like they are drowning in a sea of untrustworthy politicians that bark like big dogs and whine ine toy dogs in office.
Obama has really pissed me off terminally with his gutting of basic Constitutional rights by pushing for indefinate detainment of Americans with no trial. I flat am sorry I voted for him.
But I could never say I'm voting for Dr. Paul in here because it is banned by the nature of this forum. Which I can live with because I respect a virtual community's rights to focus it's mission that way.
But if this question comes up in a thread like this, I am perfectly in my rights in giving you some food for though on this. Because if President Obama visited Eugene again I'd stay home, and I am a very very very political animal. But I'd go early to see Dr. Paul to be in a good spot in the crowd. I just hate much of his Libertarian agenda.
If Barack Obama was more trustworthy, it would be quite a different story.