General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The White House's handling of Syria is *historically* crazy [View all]joshcryer
(62,536 posts)...then all the rhetoric will have some bit of backing as he can legitimately say "Hey, I tried everything in my power but the US people didn't want me to do anything. I'm willing to do whatever it takes, but the UN is going to have to sign off on it. I suggest hard sanctions as well as a demand to destroy the chemical weapons."
I'm not arguing for N-dimensional chess here, but I don't think he's stupid, and if he backs down after all this campaigning for it then he's going to look very weak and his advisers are already making that clear I'm sure.
Then, a weak seeming US military (one beholden to the people as opposed to the plutocrats) might be what the world needs right now. But to think of that scenario is taking N-dimensional chess to a level never before conceived and I am not arguing that right now.
Otherwise I agree that it's ass-backward unless it really is intentional and Obama does realize he's got nothing.