Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(17,055 posts)

1. Juan is right about that. There's 'no there there'. Fox just looks foolish by continuing to...

Sun Sep 8, 2013, 11:59 AM

Sep 2013

beat that busted drum of a scandal.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Well there was something there. The CIA. DirkGently Sep 2013 #2

Thank you. The CIA role there has been obscured by a cloud of Fox bullshit. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #3

Something not being discussed re: Syria. DirkGently Sep 2013 #4

An open secret for a few months now bhikkhu Sep 2013 #12

Hasn't seemed to be part of the present discussion DirkGently Sep 2013 #16

+1. Ambassador Chris Stevens' presence there, along with the CIA station riderinthestorm Sep 2013 #5

It's long past time to put that poor horse to rest. lpbk2713 Sep 2013 #6

Shut up, Juan . . . annabanana Sep 2013 #7

So, has everybody forgotten what the G-NO-P did in the first place? Curmudgeon45 Sep 2013 #8

and...... Mnpaul Sep 2013 #9

YUP thanks for bringing that up gopiscrap Sep 2013 #11

This reminds me of last fall's 'unskewed polls' Snake Plissken Sep 2013 #10

"Benghazi" still has its uses, though... TygrBright Sep 2013 #13

I guess they are figuring out the trough is empty on that issue. gtar100 Sep 2013 #14

But it was so hard learning how to spell and pronounce Benghazi! tanyev Sep 2013 #15