Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:44 PM Sep 2013

Kerry COVERS UP Iraq War Falsifications [View all]





Communications director for the Institute for Public Accuracy, Husseini said today: “Last night, John Kerry told Chris Hayes on MSNBC that he and Pentagon chief Chuck Hagel ‘opposed the president’s decision to go into Iraq...’ This is a total lie — and it covers up the fact that the administration is full of people, including Kerry and Hagel, who themselves falsely claimed Iraq had WMDs and backed the invasion of that country.

“In 2002, John Kerry voted for the Iraq war authorization, saying: ‘Why is Saddam Hussein attempting to develop nuclear weapons when most nations don’t even try? … According to intelligence, Iraq has chemical and biological weapons … Iraq is developing unmanned aerial vehicles capable of delivering chemical and biological warfare agents.’

“When I questioned Kerry in 2011 about voting to authorize the Iraq war, he said: ‘I didn’t vote for the Iraq war. I voted to give the president authority that he misused and abused. And from the moment he used it, I opposed that.’ see video at 2:30



However, a look at the record shows that after the Iraq invasion, Kerry did the opposite, outflanking Bush’s war stance in 2003: ‘I fear that in the run-up to the 2004 election the administration is considering what is tantamount to a cut-and-run strategy.’” See CNN “Kerry stands by ‘yes’ vote on Iraq war.” “It’s no wonder we’re getting so much propaganda on Syria from this administration. While President Obama continues to try to score points for one speech he gave that was critical of the Iraq war before it started, making false statements about Iraqi WMDs seems to have been a prerequisite for being picked for a top post. During the buildup to the Iraq war Joseph Biden also voted for war stating: “[Saddam Hussein] possesses chemical and biological weapons and is seeking nuclear weapons.” Susan Rice told NPR: “I think he [then Secretary of State Colin Powell] has proved that Iraq has these weapons and is hiding them, and I don’t think many informed people doubted that.”


“Some supporters of bombing Syria voted against the Iraq authorization, but made similar false claims, like Nancy Pelosi: ‘Saddam Hussein certainly has chemical and biological weapons. There’s no question about that.’ Of course individuals like John McCain continued making statements about Iraqi WMDs after the invasion: ‘I remain confident that we will find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.’ “Kerry also remarked last night that ‘we know full well how that evidence was used to persuade all of us that authority ought to be given’ is quite ironic, since we already know he has made false statements about Syria and WMDs — and it ignores that 23 senators voted against the Iraq war authorization. So, it’s easy for Jon Stewart to make fun of the Donald Rumsfeld et al ‘idiot parade‘ but that just distracts from the real point: How the entire foreign policy hierarchy of both establishment parties is addicted to falsifying for war.”


STEPHEN ZUNES, zunes at usfca.edu

Professor of politics and chair of Middle Eastern Studies at the University of San Francisco, Zunes just wrote the piece “Eight Arguments Against Going to War With Syria.” He warned in “The Case Against Kerry,” when Kerry was nominated for Secretary of State: “In 2002, he voted against an unsuccessful resolution authorizing the president to use force against Iraq only if the United Nations Security Council permitted such force under the UN Charter and instead voted for an alternative Republican resolution, which authorized President Bush to invade that oil-rich country unilaterally in violation of the UN Charter. “The October 2002 war resolution backed by Kerry was not like the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin resolution regarding Vietnam, where there was no time for reflection and debate. Kerry had been briefed by the chief UN weapons inspector and by prominent scholars of the region, who informed him of the likely absence of any of the alleged ‘weapons of mass destruction’ and the likely consequences of a U.S. invasion, but he voted to authorize the invasion anyway. It was not a ‘mistake’ or a momentary lapse of judgment. It demonstrated Kerry’s dismissive attitude toward fundamental principles of international law and international treaties that prohibit aggressive war.




cont'



http://www.accuracy.org/release/kerry-covers-up-iraq-war-falsifications/
73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"...Kerry stated at that time that he expected President Bush.. Segami Sep 2013 #1
He did not break that promise karynnj Sep 2013 #64
good job hfojvt Sep 2013 #71
Of course it's a lie. He's a fucking LIAR cali Sep 2013 #2
When Kerry challenged Bush to answer four questions... Segami Sep 2013 #3
You're wrong. Kerry opposed the DECISION to go to war when weapon inspectors proved blm Sep 2013 #4
23 Senators actually voted No on the invasion, Kerry voted Yes, Hagel voted Yes. Biden voted Yes. Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #7
And when inspectors proved WMDs were not there, Kerry stood with them and against blm Sep 2013 #12
A Yes vote was support for the decision to go to war and no amount of spin can change that Bjorn Against Sep 2013 #9
He voted Yes, and said at the time that should weapon inspectors not find what blm Sep 2013 #11
The yes vote was legally binding support for the war, the promise to stand against was mere rhetoric Bjorn Against Sep 2013 #15
Like Obama and his signing statement on the NDAA. OnyxCollie Sep 2013 #44
voting yes meant that his protests afterward would mean nothing. roguevalley Sep 2013 #54
You vote to get inspectors in and see what they find. blm Sep 2013 #55
anyone who voted for this at any stage is a weasel. I live in the boonies of roguevalley Sep 2013 #60
They were informed it would include UN weapon inspection process. blm Sep 2013 #61
Baghdad Johnny voted to give bush a blank check and cali Sep 2013 #65
there was a time in late February hfojvt Sep 2013 #70
+1,000 n/t malaise Sep 2013 #19
Thanks tio you, BLM - here is a link to David Frum in the National Review blasting Kerry for speakin karynnj Sep 2013 #66
Kerry did oppose the decision. ProSense Sep 2013 #5
23 Senators actually voted No on the invasion, Kerry voted Yes, Hagel voted Yes. Biden voted Yes. Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #8
I posted the other resolutions, and the quote doesn't contradict my point: ProSense Sep 2013 #14
I notice that you don't include Hillary Clinton karynnj Sep 2013 #67
A Yes vote to authorize Bush to go to war is not opposing the war Bjorn Against Sep 2013 #10
I guess she thinks it will Aerows Sep 2013 #16
He DID stand against the decision to invade after inspections. blm Sep 2013 #22
A Yes vote Aerows Sep 2013 #24
To use another example, the "near win" on the Amash amendment. OnyxCollie Sep 2013 #45
I'd be dizzy, but the bullshit smells Aerows Sep 2013 #47
And he said if weapon inspector reports proved there were no WMDs he'd blm Sep 2013 #18
Once again voting Yes is supporting the war even if he promised to oppose it later Bjorn Against Sep 2013 #25
At the time weapon inspections were part of IWR...other Yes Dems said the same blm Sep 2013 #28
He supported the war before the report was released Bjorn Against Sep 2013 #30
Nope - he promised IN THAT SAME SPEECH to stand against a decision blm Sep 2013 #33
He stood for the decision before he stood against it Bjorn Against Sep 2013 #35
The TRUTH matters. And it doesn't change. He did what he SAID he'd do blm Sep 2013 #41
He voted for the DECISION to invade Bjorn Against Sep 2013 #43
Then why the UN resolution to put inspectors in? blm Sep 2013 #56
These are some of the same people ProSense Sep 2013 #52
He voted yes Aerows Sep 2013 #27
He did stand against the DECISION to invade, just as he promised when he blm Sep 2013 #31
OMG Aerows Sep 2013 #48
He voted "Yes" Aerows Sep 2013 #13
Still baloney - he was against the DECISION TO INVADE after the weapon inspectors blm Sep 2013 #20
He voted YES to invade Iraq Aerows Sep 2013 #21
No one said he didn't vote Yes on IWR. And at the time IWR included weapon inspections blm Sep 2013 #26
You were just arguing and so was ProSense Aerows Sep 2013 #29
I made no such silly assertion. ProSense Sep 2013 #34
Since when did "use of military force" not mean war? NuclearDem Sep 2013 #36
The attempts to spin Aerows Sep 2013 #38
"No, it wasn't an official declaration of war, but" ProSense Sep 2013 #50
Kerry didn't agree with Bush's decision to go to invade Iraq. Aerows Sep 2013 #37
The vote was in October 2002 - the inspectors came in AFTER that the decision to go to war was March karynnj Sep 2013 #68
Do you even believe the shit you are saying? Bjorn Against Sep 2013 #39
I know exactly what I'm saying, and really don't give a shit what you think. n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #51
Oh, it's obvious that you don't give a shit what anyone thinks Aerows Sep 2013 #73
No, I said clearly that his was a tough vote, but, he stuck to his word blm Sep 2013 #57
The AUMF was an authorization to use military force against Iraq. NuclearDem Sep 2013 #17
He voted yes Aerows Sep 2013 #23
geez, he not only voted for it then, in 2004 he said he'd do it again. KG Sep 2013 #40
He's a member of the administration now NuclearDem Sep 2013 #42
It's like they expect to hold Aerows Sep 2013 #46
The politics of convenience. Dove when convenient. Hawk when convenient..or when the boss says so. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2013 #6
those of us who were paying attention since 2002 are not fooled by Kerry's attempt... mike_c Sep 2013 #32
The first person of note The Wizard Sep 2013 #49
Except now Dean supports attacking Syria. dixiegrrrrl Sep 2013 #58
Because Biden-Lugar would have prevented war in Iraq? blm Sep 2013 #59
In fall of 2002, when the resolutions were voted on, Dean supported a resolution against Iraq karynnj Sep 2013 #69
lying for the boss is his job. Kerry, like his boss, is a liar bowens43 Sep 2013 #53
Bunch of despicable liars jsr Sep 2013 #62
If you are referring to the OP - I agree karynnj Sep 2013 #72
k&r Little Star Sep 2013 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kerry COVERS UP Iraq War ...