Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Kerry COVERS UP Iraq War Falsifications [View all]

Communications director for the Institute for Public Accuracy, Husseini said today: Last night, John Kerry told Chris Hayes on MSNBC that he and Pentagon chief Chuck Hagel opposed the presidents decision to go into Iraq... This is a total lie and it covers up the fact that the administration is full of people, including Kerry and Hagel, who themselves falsely claimed Iraq had WMDs and backed the invasion of that country.
In 2002, John Kerry voted for the Iraq war authorization, saying: Why is Saddam Hussein attempting to develop nuclear weapons when most nations dont even try?
According to intelligence, Iraq has chemical and biological weapons
Iraq is developing unmanned aerial vehicles capable of delivering chemical and biological warfare agents.
When I questioned Kerry in 2011 about voting to authorize the Iraq war, he said: I didnt vote for the Iraq war. I voted to give the president authority that he misused and abused. And from the moment he used it, I opposed that. see video at 2:30
However, a look at the record shows that after the Iraq invasion, Kerry did the opposite, outflanking Bushs war stance in 2003: I fear that in the run-up to the 2004 election the administration is considering what is tantamount to a cut-and-run strategy. See CNN Kerry stands by yes vote on Iraq war. Its no wonder were getting so much propaganda on Syria from this administration. While President Obama continues to try to score points for one speech he gave that was critical of the Iraq war before it started, making false statements about Iraqi WMDs seems to have been a prerequisite for being picked for a top post. During the buildup to the Iraq war Joseph Biden also voted for war stating: [Saddam Hussein] possesses chemical and biological weapons and is seeking nuclear weapons. Susan Rice told NPR: I think he [then Secretary of State Colin Powell] has proved that Iraq has these weapons and is hiding them, and I dont think many informed people doubted that.
Some supporters of bombing Syria voted against the Iraq authorization, but made similar false claims, like Nancy Pelosi: Saddam Hussein certainly has chemical and biological weapons. Theres no question about that. Of course individuals like John McCain continued making statements about Iraqi WMDs after the invasion: I remain confident that we will find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Kerry also remarked last night that we know full well how that evidence was used to persuade all of us that authority ought to be given is quite ironic, since we already know he has made false statements about Syria and WMDs and it ignores that 23 senators voted against the Iraq war authorization. So, its easy for Jon Stewart to make fun of the Donald Rumsfeld et al idiot parade but that just distracts from the real point: How the entire foreign policy hierarchy of both establishment parties is addicted to falsifying for war.
STEPHEN ZUNES, zunes at usfca.edu
Professor of politics and chair of Middle Eastern Studies at the University of San Francisco, Zunes just wrote the piece Eight Arguments Against Going to War With Syria. He warned in The Case Against Kerry, when Kerry was nominated for Secretary of State: In 2002, he voted against an unsuccessful resolution authorizing the president to use force against Iraq only if the United Nations Security Council permitted such force under the UN Charter and instead voted for an alternative Republican resolution, which authorized President Bush to invade that oil-rich country unilaterally in violation of the UN Charter. The October 2002 war resolution backed by Kerry was not like the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin resolution regarding Vietnam, where there was no time for reflection and debate. Kerry had been briefed by the chief UN weapons inspector and by prominent scholars of the region, who informed him of the likely absence of any of the alleged weapons of mass destruction and the likely consequences of a U.S. invasion, but he voted to authorize the invasion anyway. It was not a mistake or a momentary lapse of judgment. It demonstrated Kerrys dismissive attitude toward fundamental principles of international law and international treaties that prohibit aggressive war.
cont'
http://www.accuracy.org/release/kerry-covers-up-iraq-war-falsifications/
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
23 Senators actually voted No on the invasion, Kerry voted Yes, Hagel voted Yes. Biden voted Yes.
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#7
A Yes vote was support for the decision to go to war and no amount of spin can change that
Bjorn Against
Sep 2013
#9
The yes vote was legally binding support for the war, the promise to stand against was mere rhetoric
Bjorn Against
Sep 2013
#15
anyone who voted for this at any stage is a weasel. I live in the boonies of
roguevalley
Sep 2013
#60
Thanks tio you, BLM - here is a link to David Frum in the National Review blasting Kerry for speakin
karynnj
Sep 2013
#66
23 Senators actually voted No on the invasion, Kerry voted Yes, Hagel voted Yes. Biden voted Yes.
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#8
Once again voting Yes is supporting the war even if he promised to oppose it later
Bjorn Against
Sep 2013
#25
No one said he didn't vote Yes on IWR. And at the time IWR included weapon inspections
blm
Sep 2013
#26
The vote was in October 2002 - the inspectors came in AFTER that the decision to go to war was March
karynnj
Sep 2013
#68
I know exactly what I'm saying, and really don't give a shit what you think. n/t
ProSense
Sep 2013
#51
The politics of convenience. Dove when convenient. Hawk when convenient..or when the boss says so.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Sep 2013
#6
those of us who were paying attention since 2002 are not fooled by Kerry's attempt...
mike_c
Sep 2013
#32