Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)

16. I made that same comment that I didn't think there was enough evidence yet to determine

Reply to etherealtruth (Reply #6)

Sun Sep 8, 2013, 03:32 PM

Sep 2013

whether GMOs harm people and I got attacked. You are smart to stay out of those threads. I've deleted the GMO threads. I will be staying out of that discussion myself. They seem to think if they bully people into not expressing their opinion they win the argument. They don't realize just because they have shouted everybody else down that does not mean they have won the argument. There are still lots of us still wating on the scientific research. They can think anything they want. I don't give a shit. I have better things to do than to deal with self righteous people.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Contrary to (popular?) belief, woo does exist. [View all] Archae Sep 2013 OP

Woo exists. But just because Monsanto doesn't like a scientific point of view pnwmom Sep 2013 #1

If it comes from a woo web site, it is woo. Archae Sep 2013 #3

YOU are using exactly the same tactic:guilt by association. pnwmom Sep 2013 #4

It does look like in this case Monsanto is censoring critical science. Archae Sep 2013 #7

These aren't woo scientists. pnwmom Sep 2013 #9

You have still practiced guilt by association. salib Mar 2015 #28

+1 villager Mar 2015 #27

nice job on that straw man Enrique Sep 2013 #2

Bat Boy is a fraud... Junkdrawer Sep 2013 #5

Greedo shot first n/t Scootaloo Mar 2015 #29

Woo is pervasive and very dangerous etherealtruth Sep 2013 #6

Do you know why there isn't enough scientific info? Because Monsanto and the other firms pnwmom Sep 2013 #10

I am aware and despise Monsanto etherealtruth Sep 2013 #11

I agree with you about woo. I disagree with the OP that people with concerns about GMO foods pnwmom Sep 2013 #14

There are three different types of people who oppose or are ambivalent... Humanist_Activist Sep 2013 #17

Were you aware that Monsanto and others were preventing independent researchers pnwmom Sep 2013 #18

Yes, and it seems to me that its related to how the legal system is inadequate... Humanist_Activist Sep 2013 #19

I wouldn't say GMO's are evil. And I won't say they're safe, either. pnwmom Sep 2013 #20

I would say for some, safety has been demonstrated due to unofficial experiments Humanist_Activist Sep 2013 #22

These unofficial experiments are going on in a population pnwmom Sep 2013 #23

I made that same comment that I didn't think there was enough evidence yet to determine liberal_at_heart Sep 2013 #16

There isn't enough research because the GMO producers don't allow independent researchers pnwmom Sep 2013 #21

Monsanto etherealtruth Sep 2013 #24

Woo proves that no matter intelligent or educated people are MicaelS Sep 2013 #8

Desperate people often make poor choices (regardless of intellect) etherealtruth Sep 2013 #12

In line with conventional wisdom, corporate bullshit for profit is neverending. nt Zorra Sep 2013 #13

You know what? nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #15

You can avoid whatever you want to avoid. HuckleB Mar 2015 #25

Welcome back. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #26