Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 02:39 PM Sep 2013

I wouldn't get too excited about the proposal that Syria give up it's chemical weapons [View all]

How would it work? What would the U.S. need to be convinced?

How long would it take? It would certainly be a minimum of weeks and more likely longer than that. What about the U.S. emphasis on Assad being "punished" militarily for his use of chemical weapons?

Is Assad serious about it or is the regime just stalling?


The State Department issued a statement today that the regime could not be trusted to give up its weapons. Kerry has said that it's impossible that it would happen.

<snip>

"He isn't about to do it and it can't be done obviously," Kerry said.

<snip>

"There is no one in the administration who is taking this Syria proposal seriously," the official said.

<snip>

http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/09/politics/syria-kerry/


I think we'll see within the next day or two if this proposal has a realistic chance of averting a U.S. military strike.

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Or are Obama/Kerry stalling because this isn't the outcome Israel/McCain wanted? BlueStreak Sep 2013 #1
no, I don't think that's the biggest consideration. cali Sep 2013 #4
The Russia/Syria gambit is just that, a gambit. Puzzledtraveller Sep 2013 #2
Of course it has....you think we should just throw up our hands at this early stage? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #5
I'm against any and all military action Puzzledtraveller Sep 2013 #10
So you say.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #12
I hope I am wrong. Puzzledtraveller Sep 2013 #19
Maybe, but the that the vote in the senate has been scheduled isn't cali Sep 2013 #6
The good thing is it may take the wind out of the war ship's sails. David__77 Sep 2013 #3
You mean take the wind out of the ODS sails? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #7
lol. yes, yes, 'nilla. any analysis of this that cali Sep 2013 #13
I agree with you that Syria might very well stipulate something like that. cali Sep 2013 #8
The bad thing is that those whole thing was a smokescreen to divert attention from the NSA issues BlueStreak Sep 2013 #11
Syria agreed because the chemical weapons are of limited value LittleBlue Sep 2013 #15
The threat that Syria might use them was always more powerful than would be their use. David__77 Sep 2013 #20
You're right. BlueCheese Sep 2013 #9
Oh THEY get to look "reasonable" VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #14
You don't think Russia looks reasonable... BlueCheese Sep 2013 #16
I think Russia decide to fold... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #17
You seriously want to use "reasonable" to describe Putin the Topless? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #18
good grief. that isn't even close to being what the poster said. cali Sep 2013 #21
"They get to look reasonable" VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #23
yikes. the poster said NOTHING about Putin cali Sep 2013 #25
Russia = Putin? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #27
"You don't think Russia looks reasonable..." VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #24
Dude, your monitor's SATURATED. sibelian Sep 2013 #28
Oh mine is... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #29
From the perspective of int'l public opinion, yes. David__77 Sep 2013 #22
Yeah I kinda have a cynical attitude towards this offer also! gopiscrap Sep 2013 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I wouldn't get too excite...