Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)"the first acknowledgment by the Syrian government that it even possesses chemical weapons" [View all]
Kerrys Offhand Proposal on Syria Arms Welcomed
By STEVEN LEE MYERS, MICHAEL R. GORDON and RICK GLADSTONE
MOSCOW A seemingly offhand suggestion by Secretary of State John Kerry that Syria could avert an American attack by relinquishing its chemical weapons received an almost immediate welcome from Syria, Russia, the United Nations, a key American ally and even some Republicans on Monday as a possible way to avoid a major international military showdown in the Syria crisis. A White House official said the administration was taking a hard look at the idea.
<...>
Mr. Lavrov appeared at a previously unscheduled briefing only hours after Mr. Kerry made his statement in London, taking Mr. Kerrys comments as a way to suggest a possible compromise.
We dont know whether Syria will agree with this, but if the establishment of international control over chemical weapons in the country will prevent attacks, then we will immediately begin work with Damascus, Mr. Lavrov said at the Foreign Ministry. And we call on the Syrian leadership to not only agree to setting the chemical weapons storage sites under international control, but also to their subsequent destruction.
Mr. Moallem said later in a statement that his government welcomed the Russian proposal, Russias Interfax News Agency reported, in what appeared to be the first acknowledgment by the Syrian government that it even possesses chemical weapons. The Syrian government historically has neither confirmed nor denied possessing such weapons.
In quick succession, the idea of sequestering Syrias chemical weapons stockpile was also endorsed by Britains prime minister, David Cameron, and the United Nations secretary general, Ban Ki-moon. Mr. Ban said he might propose a formal resolution to the Security Council, which has been paralyzed over how to deal with the Syria crisis from the beginning.
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/10/world/middleeast/kerry-says-syria-should-hand-over-all-chemical-arms.html
By STEVEN LEE MYERS, MICHAEL R. GORDON and RICK GLADSTONE
MOSCOW A seemingly offhand suggestion by Secretary of State John Kerry that Syria could avert an American attack by relinquishing its chemical weapons received an almost immediate welcome from Syria, Russia, the United Nations, a key American ally and even some Republicans on Monday as a possible way to avoid a major international military showdown in the Syria crisis. A White House official said the administration was taking a hard look at the idea.
<...>
Mr. Lavrov appeared at a previously unscheduled briefing only hours after Mr. Kerry made his statement in London, taking Mr. Kerrys comments as a way to suggest a possible compromise.
We dont know whether Syria will agree with this, but if the establishment of international control over chemical weapons in the country will prevent attacks, then we will immediately begin work with Damascus, Mr. Lavrov said at the Foreign Ministry. And we call on the Syrian leadership to not only agree to setting the chemical weapons storage sites under international control, but also to their subsequent destruction.
Mr. Moallem said later in a statement that his government welcomed the Russian proposal, Russias Interfax News Agency reported, in what appeared to be the first acknowledgment by the Syrian government that it even possesses chemical weapons. The Syrian government historically has neither confirmed nor denied possessing such weapons.
In quick succession, the idea of sequestering Syrias chemical weapons stockpile was also endorsed by Britains prime minister, David Cameron, and the United Nations secretary general, Ban Ki-moon. Mr. Ban said he might propose a formal resolution to the Security Council, which has been paralyzed over how to deal with the Syria crisis from the beginning.
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/10/world/middleeast/kerry-says-syria-should-hand-over-all-chemical-arms.html
It's interesting that Russia jumped on this offer so quickly. Regardless of whether or not it's a bluff, Russia and Syria have officially acknowledged Syria's chemical stockpile.
U.S. open to Russian chemical weapons proposal
By JOSH GERSTEIN
White House and State Department officials said Monday theyre open to proposals by Russia to put Syrias stocks of chemical weapons under international control, but that such talk is no reason for the U.S. to back away from President Barack Obamas threat of a military strike.
Wed have to take a hard look. Any transfer of chemical weapons to international control would be a positive development, Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes said in an interview on MSNBC. Weve been highly skeptical to date. They have not even declared their chemical weapons stockpiles.
Rhodes said the U.S. would follow up with the Russians on the point to discuss the seriousness of the proposal, but he noted that Russia has a record of defending the regime in Damascus.
<...>
State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said the U.S. would welcome the Syrian regime giving up its chemical weapons. Clearly, we think that would be a positive step for the Syrian people, for the region, for the whole international community, she said...the U.S. was treating the Russian suggestion skeptically because of that countrys record of siding with Assad in his harsh crackdown on opposition forces and civilians.
- more -
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/syria-us-russia-chemical-weapons-96472.html
By JOSH GERSTEIN
White House and State Department officials said Monday theyre open to proposals by Russia to put Syrias stocks of chemical weapons under international control, but that such talk is no reason for the U.S. to back away from President Barack Obamas threat of a military strike.
Wed have to take a hard look. Any transfer of chemical weapons to international control would be a positive development, Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes said in an interview on MSNBC. Weve been highly skeptical to date. They have not even declared their chemical weapons stockpiles.
Rhodes said the U.S. would follow up with the Russians on the point to discuss the seriousness of the proposal, but he noted that Russia has a record of defending the regime in Damascus.
<...>
State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said the U.S. would welcome the Syrian regime giving up its chemical weapons. Clearly, we think that would be a positive step for the Syrian people, for the region, for the whole international community, she said...the U.S. was treating the Russian suggestion skeptically because of that countrys record of siding with Assad in his harsh crackdown on opposition forces and civilians.
- more -
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/syria-us-russia-chemical-weapons-96472.html
Russia to push Syria to surrender chemical weapons
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023628880
UN Chief Urges Syria to Transfer Chemical Weapons
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023629253
17 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"the first acknowledgment by the Syrian government that it even possesses chemical weapons" [View all]
ProSense
Sep 2013
OP
You do know that Russia is pushing Syria to turn over its stockpile, and Syria has accepted
ProSense
Sep 2013
#2
That makes no sense. You're saying that after acknowledging possession, Syria could turn around
ProSense
Sep 2013
#4
so then surely you can post a link to this alleged veto on action specific to Syria's use of
Warren Stupidity
Sep 2013
#17