Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)

9. yup that`s the problem...

Reply to MineralMan (Reply #3)

Mon Sep 9, 2013, 04:19 PM

Sep 2013

disposing of these chemicals is no one wants them anywhere near their city and it`s almost as expensive and complicated as building a nuke reactor.
russia is facing the same problems with their stockpiles.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Blue Grass Army Depot in the USA has tons of chemical weapons, including 523 tons of nerve agent [View all] quinnox Sep 2013 OP

We're exceptional, you should know that. NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #1

Are you saying JustAnotherGen Sep 2013 #2

No, not exactly quinnox Sep 2013 #5

No my answer is JustAnotherGen Sep 2013 #11

The US pioneered chemical warfare. and we turned a blind eye while Saddam used it to turn the tide Erose999 Sep 2013 #6

Hmmm pioneered? JustAnotherGen Sep 2013 #12

Well, it does raise the question on the security of such weapons in a "free" society haele Sep 2013 #13

Yup. They'll be destroying chemical weapons there. MineralMan Sep 2013 #3

yup that`s the problem... madrchsod Sep 2013 #9

That is part of the problem, for sure. MineralMan Sep 2013 #10

It was reported a couple of weeks ago that mustard gas was leaking Autumn Sep 2013 #4

There's lots more in Northern Nevada, too Nevernose Sep 2013 #7

History: US Covered-Up for Decades the Largest Use of Biological & Chemical Weapons in History Catherina Sep 2013 #8