Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
12. al Assad has two VPs who don't hold much power, but they are VPs.
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 12:28 AM
Sep 2013

al Assad is the big boss and his brother runs the Army. They would need to leave.

That would enable the VPs, with the assistance of international actors and agencies, to come to the table and negotiate some sort of power sharing or other accommodation with the rebel groups. Maybe schedule a few elections, divvy up cabinet posts, whatever they think might work.

al-Assad will NOT negotiate. He doesn't want to share power. He wants to continue to be the despot.

You think the rebels will just stop fighting if the US backs away from trying to help solve this? Hell no--it will only get uglier and more people will die.

This "dump the dictator, not the regime" thing is called a "Yemen scenario." It has been the goal of USA and the Arab League, and others, for over TWO YEARS now. It makes a great deal of sense--it's better than letting a bunch of different rebel groups slug it out against al-Assad, and if they kill him, then kill one another until the last, most brutal nutcase is left standing...

A Yemen scenario lowers the bloodshed and gets all the players to the table without everyone having to die first.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not rocket science. Incoherent fiction NoOneMan Sep 2013 #1
Google the YEMEN SCENARIO FOR SYRIA. MADem Sep 2013 #10
If you say so NoOneMan Sep 2013 #11
Good info flamingdem Sep 2013 #13
That's like having Hitler step down and Goebbels take over LittleBlue Sep 2013 #2
This is what was done in Yemen. KittyWampus Sep 2013 #4
The reason they don't want regime change right now is because there is no moderate pnwmom Sep 2013 #8
al Assad has two VPs who don't hold much power, but they are VPs. MADem Sep 2013 #12
Total underestimation of how hard it is to divide a country LittleBlue Sep 2013 #14
No one is talking about "dividing" anything. MADem Sep 2013 #16
Because. Of. History. truedelphi Sep 2013 #3
Assad stepping down is looking increasingly unlikely quinnox Sep 2013 #5
I know. It's like comparing the NSA to the Stasi. KittyWampus Sep 2013 #6
All that will do -- if al-Assad does not leave, or does not decide to power-share with the MADem Sep 2013 #15
Funny how that works, indeed. Amonester Sep 2013 #17
Stalemate was the likely goal flamingdem Sep 2013 #7
Deposing a head of state through force is regime change. cthulu2016 Sep 2013 #9
Your fabrication does not match the words of the man. R. Daneel Olivaw Sep 2013 #18
Because it sounds good as a way to equate President Cha Sep 2013 #19
Obama is such a masterful politician that wherever he ends up is where he intended to start with Fumesucker Sep 2013 #20
Wow that was the most Ichingcarpenter Sep 2013 #21
Wow that was the most Ichingcarpenter Sep 2013 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Regime Change Was Never T...»Reply #12