Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So I'm expected to believe Obama never intended to attack Syria? [View all]madokie
(51,076 posts)80. Knowing full well when he said it that the pukes weren't going to have anything to do with it
because he said he was for it. Don't you see how that works. Obama is a lot smarter than a lot of people here. He seen early on that the pukes were going to be against any and all things he's for so the best thing in that case is to say he is for something that he really isn't. The end result is he wins they lose.
I see whats going on plain as day, why some can't is beyond me.
Haters are gonna hate, simple as that
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So I'm expected to believe Obama never intended to attack Syria? [View all]
whatchamacallit
Sep 2013
OP
If there is anyone here whose current SS payments would be cut by Obama, please raise your hand.
kelliekat44
Sep 2013
#70
Knowing full well when he said it that the pukes weren't going to have anything to do with it
madokie
Sep 2013
#80
You wouldn't know it from the deranged victory lap being taken on DU today.
whatchamacallit
Sep 2013
#8
Yep ...just like you were not expected to believe that he put SS on the table. n/t
L0oniX
Sep 2013
#11
He never liked Wall Street either, and really wanted single payer healthcare.
polichick
Sep 2013
#20
The vote against military action would be bipartisan. And actually it would benefit the
totodeinhere
Sep 2013
#67
He did intend to with a "coalition of the willing" which disolved in the British Parliament and
Tierra_y_Libertad
Sep 2013
#64
Its funny because the people claiming this to be multidimensional chess...
RedCappedBandit
Sep 2013
#68
Should he have just asked Nicely? "Pweeeeeeeeeze Mr. Brutal Dictator?"
Blue State Bandit
Sep 2013
#81