Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: For the Factually Challenged: Human Rights Organization Concludes Syrian Government Culpable [View all]proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)40. Related.
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/18702-obamas-case-for-syria-didnt-reflect-intel-consensus
Obama's Case for Syria Didn't Reflect Intel Consensus
Monday, 09 September 2013 11:31
By Gareth Porter, Inter Press Service | Report
Washington, DC - Contrary to the general impression in Congress and the news media, the Syria chemical warfare intelligence summary released by the Barack Obama administration Aug. 30 did not represent an intelligence community assessment, an IPS analysis and interviews with former intelligence officials reveals.
The evidence indicates that Director of National Intelligence James Clapper culled intelligence analyses from various agencies and by the White House itself, but that the White House itself had the final say in the contents of the document.
Leading members of Congress to believe that the document was an intelligence community assessment and thus represents a credible picture of the intelligence on the alleged chemical attack of Aug. 21 has been a central element in the Obama administrations case for war in Syria.
That part of the strategy, at least, has been successful. Despite strong opposition in Congress to the proposed military strike in Syria, no one in either chamber has yet challenged the administrations characterisation of the intelligence. But the administration is vulnerable to the charge that it has put out an intelligence document that does not fully and accurately reflect the views of intelligence analysts.
Former intelligence officials told IPS that that the paper does not represent a genuine intelligence community assessment but rather one reflecting a predominantly Obama administration influence.
<>
Obama's Case for Syria Didn't Reflect Intel Consensus
Monday, 09 September 2013 11:31
By Gareth Porter, Inter Press Service | Report
Washington, DC - Contrary to the general impression in Congress and the news media, the Syria chemical warfare intelligence summary released by the Barack Obama administration Aug. 30 did not represent an intelligence community assessment, an IPS analysis and interviews with former intelligence officials reveals.
The evidence indicates that Director of National Intelligence James Clapper culled intelligence analyses from various agencies and by the White House itself, but that the White House itself had the final say in the contents of the document.
Leading members of Congress to believe that the document was an intelligence community assessment and thus represents a credible picture of the intelligence on the alleged chemical attack of Aug. 21 has been a central element in the Obama administrations case for war in Syria.
That part of the strategy, at least, has been successful. Despite strong opposition in Congress to the proposed military strike in Syria, no one in either chamber has yet challenged the administrations characterisation of the intelligence. But the administration is vulnerable to the charge that it has put out an intelligence document that does not fully and accurately reflect the views of intelligence analysts.
Former intelligence officials told IPS that that the paper does not represent a genuine intelligence community assessment but rather one reflecting a predominantly Obama administration influence.
<>
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
For the Factually Challenged: Human Rights Organization Concludes Syrian Government Culpable [View all]
michigandem58
Sep 2013
OP
Have you noticed the number of folks willing to overlook these atrocities just because Obama wants..
Tarheel_Dem
Sep 2013
#2
If you did a Venn diagram of those who would ignore Sarin gas attacks by Bashir Assad
msanthrope
Sep 2013
#6
It's amazing the bedfellows that mere opposition to Obama has thrown together, huh?
Tarheel_Dem
Sep 2013
#55
Oh, he's been a DU "hero" ever since Snowden gave his "gratitude and respect" to Russia
Cha
Sep 2013
#62
Girl, I didn't even see that, but how do you answer false equivalencies? What's happened to DU?
Tarheel_Dem
Sep 2013
#68
I still think that progressives are smarter than conservatives. Which makes figuring out
Number23
Sep 2013
#70
Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International were both wrong on Gulf War 1.
avaistheone1
Sep 2013
#15
So let the poster cite the actual HRW article, and language, without adding spin.
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2013
#24
"likely culprit" is not equal to "Concludes Syrian Government Culpable"
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2013
#23
The HRW report contains the same errors as the State Dept, more so as it had no access at all to
leveymg
Sep 2013
#37
I do not rule out the possibility it was the regime, or more likely some unit commander who
leveymg
Sep 2013
#48
Of course, they have also asked Obama to prosecute Bush war crimes, can we do that first?
grahamhgreen
Sep 2013
#49