Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

surfdog

(624 posts)
48. The question is ...
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 01:57 PM
Feb 2012

Why is he running for president ?

Nader is well aware that he can't win any states much less the nomination

If he knows he can't win then why is he running ?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

wow. what a dumbass. he is directly responsible for the bush years. bowens43 Feb 2012 #1
No. ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2012 #4
lol, cool story bro... dionysus Feb 2012 #5
Who defended it? ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2012 #7
it wouldn't have been close enough to steal if Nader had sincerely endorsed Gore virtualobserver Feb 2012 #57
Was New Hampshire stolen? hfojvt Feb 2012 #65
This makes a false assumption. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2012 #83
I can't believe people are still blaming Nader for what the Court did. white_wolf Feb 2012 #12
They wont blame Gore. ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2012 #16
sandra day o'conner will forever be dead to me. Javaman Feb 2012 #26
She's a woman. She get to turn the spit that Rehnquist is roasting on. aquart Feb 2012 #45
Since he was the one they voted for, then YES, he was. aquart Feb 2012 #34
So the USSC did not make that decision? nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #28
The question is ... surfdog Feb 2012 #48
The fact that you framed this qusation the way you did nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #53
Yeah, pretty ridiculous. I guess it is "Nader Defenders Coming Out of the Woodwork Day" on DU. FSogol Feb 2012 #51
I prefer to lay blame where it exists nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #54
Ralph Nader - Useful Idiot. Nader Supporters - Plain-old Idiots. FSogol Feb 2012 #58
Given that Gore WON and that the count from the PRESS released on Sept 11 nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #61
I'm not blaming Nader, I'm ridiculing his supporters on DU. FSogol Feb 2012 #64
Again, I am glad how you talk of your fellow Americans nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #66
Laughable FSogol Feb 2012 #69
Alas you are assuming that if I defend his right to run by any eligible American... nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #70
truth. dionysus Mar 2012 #80
It's not an either/or proposition DefenseLawyer Feb 2012 #6
Math. ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2012 #11
So you are telling me I shouldn't assume that 544 of the 97,488 that voted Nader DefenseLawyer Feb 2012 #20
reread what you wrote... Javaman Feb 2012 #29
Have it your way, Chief. DefenseLawyer Feb 2012 #39
It's not my way. I can't predict how they would have voted Javaman Feb 2012 #41
It's not about "blame" DefenseLawyer Feb 2012 #42
+1 /nt October Feb 2012 #47
so by you giving him a +1 means you think I'm a nader supporter???? Javaman Feb 2012 #55
Wow. Way to jump to conclusions and assume I'm lazy. October Mar 2012 #89
1) I'm not defending nader... Javaman Feb 2012 #50
Saying he had the right to run DefenseLawyer Feb 2012 #72
Doesn't matter. ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2012 #75
If Gore had earned the votes? If my Aunt had a dick she'd be my Uncle DefenseLawyer Feb 2012 #76
Gore didn't run a bad campaign One of the 99 Mar 2012 #85
Yeah well, you know, that's just like, your opinion, man DefenseLawyer Mar 2012 #86
Doesn't change the fact One of the 99 Mar 2012 #90
No matter what spin you put on it he cost Gore the election in 2000. If it wasn't for him we demosincebirth Feb 2012 #10
Pathetic. ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2012 #14
You're the one that's pathetic. I'm not the one that's getting flamed. Maybe you're blinded by demosincebirth Feb 2012 #23
I don't know. Javaman Feb 2012 #30
Never voted for him. ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2012 #74
It was a perfect storm ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2012 #36
something is, for sure. nt dionysus Mar 2012 #81
The title of the court case was xxqqqzme Feb 2012 #73
Nader was responsible One of the 99 Mar 2012 #84
Define "stole" Ter Mar 2012 #92
Nader didn't cause Gore to fail to get the votes of the left in Florida. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2012 #17
yes and no. Javaman Feb 2012 #31
yep Liberal_in_LA Feb 2012 #43
Right. The 2000 election wasn't stolen and the Supreme Court had nothing to do with it. Better Believe It Feb 2012 #59
I wish he would too. applegrove Feb 2012 #77
Meh. Liberal Veteran Feb 2012 #2
my thoughts exactly, why run just for Pres unless to act as a spoiler Demonaut Feb 2012 #15
+1 nt Javaman Feb 2012 #32
Ick. madamesilverspurs Feb 2012 #3
He gladly takes contributions from Republicans DefenseLawyer Feb 2012 #8
Oh yippee sharp_stick Feb 2012 #9
Oh fuck him. HappyMe Feb 2012 #13
I'll suspend my reaction until this is confirmed, but Chorophyll Feb 2012 #18
In 2004 he got 0.38% of the vote. In 2008 he got 0.56% of the vote. Alexander Feb 2012 #19
Wait till the debates jimmie Feb 2012 #21
The debates he won't be participating in? Alexander Feb 2012 #63
Yeah, he's really zooming up the charts. nt Javaman Feb 2012 #33
Bush won Florida and the Presidency by just over 1,000 votes, out of millions cast. bluestate10 Feb 2012 #79
Bush "won" Florida by 537 votes. Nader won over 97,000 votes. Alexander Mar 2012 #91
I've been watching and didn't hear it. Are you sure you don't mean Bob Kerrey is considering maddezmom Feb 2012 #22
He's a modern day Lyndon Larouche Renew Deal Feb 2012 #24
.. Sinistrous Feb 2012 #25
Good for him. bigwillq Feb 2012 #27
The Koch Bros. have deep DEEP pockets. Tarheel_Dem Feb 2012 #35
He's running for what? craigmatic Feb 2012 #37
Fuck Nader. Odin2005 Feb 2012 #38
Seriously, Ralph? Arkana Feb 2012 #40
yawn....zzzzzzzzzzz spanone Feb 2012 #44
from another pie to the face? Rex Feb 2012 #46
I doubt anyone will take him seriously this time around. n/t Cleita Feb 2012 #49
Anyone have a link? Buehler? Buehler? eom Raine1967 Feb 2012 #52
Running? I hope he got an OK from the doc to do that. MineralMan Feb 2012 #56
I do not understamd why he keeps running. RebelOne Feb 2012 #60
He would have been able to accomplish so much more if he'd stayed a anti-corporate crusader. Arugula Latte Feb 2012 #62
What a fucking joke graywarrior Feb 2012 #67
anyone who votes for him now doesn't understand marlakay Feb 2012 #68
Looks like GOP dirty tricks spent some cash itsrobert Feb 2012 #71
Only a fool would vote for Nader given what is at stake. nt bluestate10 Feb 2012 #78
Fuck Nader. DevonRex Mar 2012 #82
This seems relevent Bruce Wayne Mar 2012 #87
and water is wet. Is a negative vote possible? magical thyme Mar 2012 #88
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»On MSNBC interview : Nade...»Reply #48