Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Be prepared: the war pigs are pissed! [View all]Zorra
(27,670 posts)4. We spend more money on our war machine than the rest of the world combined.
Seems to me we that could easily make defense cuts without undermining our credibility. Maybe we could impose a stiff Offshore Transnational Corporation Protection Tax to pay for 50% of the war machine budget.
Make them pay for their private world police war machine that protects their private profit making interests around the world.
Why should American taxpayers be forced to pay huge sums for the security of private interests that have no allegiance to our country?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Even if there is no war it will be hard to argue in favor of defense cuts.
Nuclear Unicorn
Sep 2013
#1
That is your simplistic spin & it remains spin no matter how often you repost!
Divernan
Sep 2013
#100
The title of the post you're replying to says, "I'm not arguing against defense cuts."
Nuclear Unicorn
Sep 2013
#102
We are currently the owners of the world's largest stash of chemical weapons
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#15
I'm not arguing against cuts. I'm stating the reality of diplomatic and political optics.
Nuclear Unicorn
Sep 2013
#16
Optics can be reframed easily. Optics as you use the term means 'false image'
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#61
C'mon guys! This is the 3rd time this comment has been made. I've answered each time.
Nuclear Unicorn
Sep 2013
#34
We could have a "credible threat of force" with a fourth of the defense budget.
rhett o rick
Sep 2013
#58
oh That. Yes, I am sure Grayson got extra bucks for going there. Bucks from all kinds. n/t
Whisp
Sep 2013
#75
Sen. Angry Grumpy Grandpa was pushing their talking points on NPR this A.M.
bullwinkle428
Sep 2013
#10
If the MIC wants to go to war, the Congress or the President should impose a war tax on each
kelliekat44
Sep 2013
#13
According to you and your clique, Obama & Kerry themselves are war pigs or at least their stooges.
KittyWampus
Sep 2013
#22
Getting a little upset are we? oh ...btw ...nice start on your transparency page. n/t
L0oniX
Sep 2013
#26
yeah… pretty funny how the delicate flowers can do that to people they don't agree with.
KittyWampus
Sep 2013
#72
No one can gloss over the venomous bullshit displayed on your tranparency page
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#63
LOL! Venomous hate? what the hell are you talking about? My responding to the bullies?
KittyWampus
Sep 2013
#73
President Eisenhower in his exit speech. A speech every America should know by heart but sadly don't
snagglepuss
Sep 2013
#31
The original copy of the speech was "Military-Industrial- Congressional Complex".
Fuddnik
Sep 2013
#41
You got it. We are messing with their money. You can expect a false-flag attack.
AnotherMcIntosh
Sep 2013
#33
This whole Syria thing is because Raytheon and the other military corps want an infusion of our $
Sarah Ibarruri
Sep 2013
#78