Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Shemp Howard

(889 posts)
28. We don't care about the casualties?
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 10:48 AM
Sep 2013

That is actually insulting, although I'm sure you don't mean it that way.

Please rt, don't fall into a logic trap like the one we saw back in 2003. I'm sure you recall that if, back then, you were against the Iraq invasion, you were more than just wrong. You were labelled as unpatriotic and unAmerican, or worse. Remember all the mud that was thrown at the Dixie Chicks?

With apologies to John Lennon, sometimes military action is the answer. Hitler just had to be stopped, for example. But there are many, many more times when military action just makes a bad situation worse.

One can be very much against a Syrian strike, and still care very much about all the civilian deaths in the conflict. That statement is so obvious that it almost does not need to even be said.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And don't forget to tell your friends and family to view the awesome videos. jsr Sep 2013 #1
Post removed Post removed Sep 2013 #38
Thug? TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #39
UN charter- "The use of THREAT of force" is illegal ellenrr Sep 2013 #2
But, it will make our children safer. What about the children? The Link Sep 2013 #3
indeed. and here are some more children xchrom Sep 2013 #4
Well, that wasn't really a war. The Link Sep 2013 #5
I'm so sorry, Link. About your dad, that is... truth2power Sep 2013 #10
you're the second person today to mention a run in with agent orange. xchrom Sep 2013 #11
This last week has been a low point for Obama. iemitsu Sep 2013 #6
You'd be stressed too dude rtracey Sep 2013 #16
see post 4 above niyad Sep 2013 #23
As if being made into body parts or have large holes poked into you is somehow better? RC Sep 2013 #26
It's more than that. The reason for the ban on chemical... TheMadMonk Sep 2013 #54
Hadn't thought of that. RC Sep 2013 #55
We don't care about the casualties? Shemp Howard Sep 2013 #28
"and there are a lot of people who don't give a shit..." R. Daneel Olivaw Sep 2013 #36
Starting with the 100 million plus Americans who don't give a fuck... TheMadMonk Sep 2013 #52
Obama never was "the smartest guy in the room" like so many here thought. arewenotdemo Sep 2013 #30
In Texas it is called, Guilt by Association. DhhD Sep 2013 #35
True, that he is not very good at picking advisors iemitsu Sep 2013 #62
It doesn't matter. He is already 37 steps ahead of you n2doc Sep 2013 #7
Indeed jsr Sep 2013 #8
perfect goatmilker Sep 2013 #24
Thanks xchrom. I was just about to post the link to this article... truth2power Sep 2013 #9
The President needs a history refresher course. CrispyQ Sep 2013 #22
Bill is an old friend of mine. I used to work with him back in DC. He must be getting old now. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #49
According to Obama, we're NOT the world's "policeman", after all. arewenotdemo Sep 2013 #32
At least he' didn't throw Home Depot a bone last night and get into duct tape and plastic sheeting Snake Plissken Sep 2013 #12
Thats funny bahrbearian Sep 2013 #18
We must have war because the people want us to deal with our own problems instead. grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #13
That's been a theme here on DU durablend Sep 2013 #43
5. “For nearly seven decades, the United States has been the anchor of global security. ..." Coyotl Sep 2013 #14
Or more recently...who overthrew and murdered Qaddafi in Libya? arewenotdemo Sep 2013 #34
Matthew Rothschild. LOL... SidDithers Sep 2013 #15
would you be kind enough to show us what he got wrong? it would be helpful. niyad Sep 2013 #27
Why do you do that, Sid? You throw out these ad hominem attacks.. truth2power Sep 2013 #46
No 1 is not wrong ProSense Sep 2013 #17
Try actually reading the War Powers Resolutoin. JayhawkSD Sep 2013 #20
Yes, ProSense Sep 2013 #25
Read all of it. JayhawkSD Sep 2013 #51
Amerika Uber Alles. TheMadMonk Sep 2013 #57
Your reading comprehension is hampered by your apparent agenda. nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #63
Number 1 is CORRECT, according to THIS guy: bvar22 Sep 2013 #58
That's really a low blow. rhett o rick Sep 2013 #64
Perfect quote! dreamnightwind Sep 2013 #66
Yeah, especially on account of the fact that this truedelphi Sep 2013 #60
I could only get 2 minutes into the speech before I turned it off in disgust MNBrewer Sep 2013 #19
The SCOTUS ,,, Cryptoad Sep 2013 #21
K&R idwiyo Sep 2013 #29
K&R pscot Sep 2013 #31
What good is being fredamae Sep 2013 #33
After the speech, my husband wanted to hear what the heads on faux news had to say.. mountain grammy Sep 2013 #37
! TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #41
Only a schizophrenic would be able to follow Obama's reasoning at this point Ocelot Sep 2013 #40
So, now that we're not "going to war" the President is still a piece of shit? Just want to... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #42
As soon as he rescinds NSA spying and opts out the Trans Pacific Partnership scam... Ocelot Sep 2013 #44
That's all? I can think of at least another... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #45
DURec leftstreet Sep 2013 #47
I wonder how much this whole thing has been fueled by a desire to change the subject from NSA Marr Sep 2013 #48
K&R! Phlem Sep 2013 #50
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Sep 2013 #53
K&R forestpath Sep 2013 #56
K&R Thank you for posting this. nt woo me with science Sep 2013 #59
#2. The US fhad no compunctions whatsoever about helping Saddam Hussein-- eridani Sep 2013 #61
Commondreams.org or Obama gulliver Sep 2013 #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The 5 Most Ludicrous War ...»Reply #28