Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Thu Sep 12, 2013, 10:52 AM Sep 2013

Ketchum Placed Controversial Putin Op-Ed [View all]

Ketchum Placed Controversial Putin Op-Ed

The PR firm’s biggest Russia coup ever?

Rosie Gray

WASHINGTON — The public relations firm Ketchum is responsible for placing a controversial editorial that appeared under Russian President Vladimir Putin’s byline in the New York Times on Wednesday night.

“The op-ed came through the PR firm (Ketchum) and went thought the normal editing process,” said New York Times spokesperson Eileen Murphy in an email to BuzzFeed.

Spokespeople for Ketchum did not return requests for comment.

Ketchum is the main PR firm used by the Russian government. Using documents publicly filed with the Department of Justice, ProPublica showed last year how Ketchum places pro-Putin op-eds under the bylines of “seemingly independent professionals” in various news outlets like CNBC and the Huffington Post.

A tweet last week from Paddy Blewer, a Ketchum employee, appears to reference the work being done on the Putin op-ed:

Paddy Blewer@PadskyFollow

Great week. Gazprom (#client) results & strategic China deal. Big internal project. Countdown to #holiday has begun. Where's the trolley?

Reply Retweet Favorite

- more -

http://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/ketchum-placed-controversial-putin-op-ed

Ah, pro-Putin propaganda pushed by the NYT.

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
K & R. Does Ketchum Inc ring a bell? FSogol Sep 2013 #1
Thanks for posting. n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #2
Anytime. N/T FSogol Sep 2013 #6
Apparently, this is a good precedent. ProSense Sep 2013 #9
Thanks for the linking the dots. dballance Sep 2013 #12
Didn't Ketchum pay Maggie Gallagher (homophobe) to post propaganda??? nt msanthrope Sep 2013 #18
Yup, good memeory. FSogol Sep 2013 #21
No wonder gay-hatin' Pootie loves 'em! nt MADem Sep 2013 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author Vinnie From Indy Sep 2013 #3
Obama could use a good PR firm about now! n/t leftstreet Sep 2013 #4
Yeah, propaganda is good, right? n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #7
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #5
Welcome to DU. The PR firm is not the NYT editors. ProSense Sep 2013 #8
What is your point? Vinnie From Indy Sep 2013 #10
Point: The PR firm is not the NYT editors. ProSense Sep 2013 #11
Still not getting it! Vinnie From Indy Sep 2013 #13
You ProSense Sep 2013 #14
Frankly, I have no idea what your OP means. Vinnie From Indy Sep 2013 #15
the point is OP viewpoint = good, other viewpoints = bad. standard PR campaign stuff nt msongs Sep 2013 #16
I can't help you think. n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #17
No, but you can let me know what your OP is supposed to mean. Vinnie From Indy Sep 2013 #19
No, I can't because something clearly apparent ProSense Sep 2013 #22
I guess you can add this response to the long list of your posts that Vinnie From Indy Sep 2013 #23
Thanks ProSense. Scurrilous Sep 2013 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ketchum Placed Controvers...