Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Vinnie From Indy

(10,820 posts)

23. I guess you can add this response to the long list of your posts that

Reply to ProSense (Reply #22)

Thu Sep 12, 2013, 01:36 PM

Sep 2013

have me completely stumped.

No, I can't because something clearly apparent obvious to the letter including my brief comment in the OP isn't enough to help you think this through.

Ok! Now you are just screwing with me right? Try as I might, I cannot crack ProsenseSpeak. Is English your second language?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ketchum Placed Controversial Putin Op-Ed [View all] ProSense Sep 2013 OP

K & R. Does Ketchum Inc ring a bell? FSogol Sep 2013 #1

Thanks for posting. n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #2

Anytime. N/T FSogol Sep 2013 #6

Apparently, this is a good precedent. ProSense Sep 2013 #9

Thanks for the linking the dots. dballance Sep 2013 #12

Didn't Ketchum pay Maggie Gallagher (homophobe) to post propaganda??? nt msanthrope Sep 2013 #18

Yup, good memeory. FSogol Sep 2013 #21

No wonder gay-hatin' Pootie loves 'em! nt MADem Sep 2013 #24

This message was self-deleted by its author Vinnie From Indy Sep 2013 #3

Obama could use a good PR firm about now! n/t leftstreet Sep 2013 #4

Yeah, propaganda is good, right? n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #7

Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #5

Welcome to DU. The PR firm is not the NYT editors. ProSense Sep 2013 #8

What is your point? Vinnie From Indy Sep 2013 #10

Point: The PR firm is not the NYT editors. ProSense Sep 2013 #11

Still not getting it! Vinnie From Indy Sep 2013 #13

You ProSense Sep 2013 #14

Frankly, I have no idea what your OP means. Vinnie From Indy Sep 2013 #15

the point is OP viewpoint = good, other viewpoints = bad. standard PR campaign stuff nt msongs Sep 2013 #16

I can't help you think. n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #17

No, but you can let me know what your OP is supposed to mean. Vinnie From Indy Sep 2013 #19

No, I can't because something clearly apparent ProSense Sep 2013 #22

I guess you can add this response to the long list of your posts that Vinnie From Indy Sep 2013 #23

Thanks ProSense. Scurrilous Sep 2013 #20