Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: FUCK THE NRA, the gun-nut wing of the Republican Party. [View all]Tommy_Carcetti
(44,498 posts)168. :) nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
170 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Koch Brothers thank you for your support of their elected Democrat recall effort. nt
onehandle
Sep 2013
#41
The voters ousted them. Recall opponents outspent the NRA side by almost than 5:1
NYC_SKP
Sep 2013
#3
Eventually, the NRA, gun-nutters, and Gun Industrial Complex will lose. Unfortunately, the GIC
madinmaryland
Sep 2013
#5
With climate change and pending water and food shortages, I think we'll all go down together.
NYC_SKP
Sep 2013
#7
Of course not. It'd make your side look bad and that victory you're celebrating less than perfect.
2ndAmForComputers
Sep 2013
#52
Wow. As if there are sides and as if I had control over campaign spending laws.
NYC_SKP
Sep 2013
#81
No. The NRA and the gun-nutters hi-jacked and ousted duly elected representatives.
madinmaryland
Sep 2013
#6
No. The NRA ousted them. Without the influx of the NRA and Koch brothers money, they would not hav
madinmaryland
Sep 2013
#18
Where's the link about the $400k? So you admit you just made that up? I'll have to bookmark this!
DanTex
Sep 2013
#59
LOL. Again, those are the official numbers which *do not* include the unreported amounts spent
DanTex
Sep 2013
#62
So you pull a number out of your ass and that is all of a sudden a undisputed fact?
hack89
Sep 2013
#65
Says a lot when Dems can't motivate their voters - would NRA ads make you stay at home? nt
hack89
Sep 2013
#71
So you're just going to forget the whole $400K number you fabricated? Pretend that never happened?
DanTex
Sep 2013
#74
Says a lot when Dems can't motivate their voters - would NRA ads make you stay at home?
hack89
Sep 2013
#69
Maybe if we stopped painting the 50 million gun owners in this country as lunatics
The Straight Story
Sep 2013
#15
Maybe if thethe 50 million gun owners in this country didn't paint themselves as lunatics,
madinmaryland
Sep 2013
#17
If all 50+ million gun owners were "lunatics," there'd be millions and millions of shootings.
Lizzie Poppet
Sep 2013
#93
So true, it's horrible that some people here can't come to terms with it...
GalaxyHunter
Sep 2013
#118
I don't know of a single public official calling for a blanket ban on all firearms post Sandy Hook.
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2013
#167
Maybe if gun owners truly acted "responsibly" by backing laws against proliferation of guns, toting
Hoyt
Sep 2013
#84
You're telling me that these so called militia nuts are more dangerous than the street gangs
wild bird
Sep 2013
#138
The militia nuts, and those that aspire to be, accumulate weapons. Some traffic in weapons.
Hoyt
Sep 2013
#149
Maybe people just don't like do nothing laws, like the new ones abortion - ultrasounds, etc
The Straight Story
Sep 2013
#112
Then, let's do away with "do nothing laws" -- ban all semi-auto rifles and most public toting.
Hoyt
Sep 2013
#132
Don't care about guns in circulation already. I do care about another 100 million in the next decade
Hoyt
Sep 2013
#150
Cool. In the 1960s, there was no appetite to restrict on smoking either. But today . . . . . .
Hoyt
Sep 2013
#153
And yet most people with guns that look like that do no harm at all with them
The Straight Story
Sep 2013
#139
Actually shooter, I would like to see people using revolvers. That too would help put an end to
Hoyt
Sep 2013
#161
Funny, the people who oppose the gun laws are the same ones pushing the abortion laws.
DanTex
Sep 2013
#141
And vice versa, people pro-choice become anti-choice quick on other things
The Straight Story
Sep 2013
#142
I think all should be judged on a case by case basis based on risks and benefits.
DanTex
Sep 2013
#151
There's also Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, Australia (ok that's an island)...
DanTex
Sep 2013
#156
A better estimate is that there are 70 to 80 million gun owners and that might be low. ...
spin
Sep 2013
#146
You lot don't seem to like democracy when it doesn't produce the results you want...
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2013
#33
What is your motivation? I will not defend a position that I do not support as truth.
lonestarnot
Sep 2013
#34
And you seem to be a big fan of Koch Brothers' money influencing local elections...
DanTex
Sep 2013
#40
Did you try google? I know you really like gunz.com but they're not reallya reliable news source...
DanTex
Sep 2013
#50
Which means that Dems need to learn from this when it comes to introducing gun control
hack89
Sep 2013
#73
Build up more awareness of the harms of gun violence, develop more effective GOTV strategies.
DanTex
Sep 2013
#76
Riiight. Because the Gun Lobby never rams through legislation where it sees the easy opportunity to.
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2013
#82
"People that disagree with me are stupid" Now that's a winning political message.
hack89
Sep 2013
#88
So I guess you don't think those creationists pushing Texas schoolbooks are dumb...
DanTex
Sep 2013
#99
We are talking about your views on guns - please read what I actually wrote nt.
hack89
Sep 2013
#102
Sure sign of winning an argument: when the other person drops even the pretense
DanTex
Sep 2013
#113
That must have been a great day for you! Shame your alerts this thread didn't work out.
DanTex
Sep 2013
#135
And we all know that elections are predicated only on votes rather than influence, money, etc.
LanternWaste
Sep 2013
#54