Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

questionseverything

(11,899 posts)
16. end game
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 12:16 PM
Sep 2013
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/larry_summers_and_the_end-game_memo_20130825/


The year was 1997. US Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin was pushing hard to de-regulate banks. That required, first, repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act to dismantle the barrier between commercial banks and investment banks. It was like replacing bank vaults with roulette wheels.

Second, the banks wanted the right to play a new high-risk game: “derivatives trading.” JP Morgan alone would soon carry $88 trillion of these pseudo-securities on its books as “assets.”

But their work wouldn’t end there. Prudent financial controllers who wanted to protect their wealth rather than just get rich could simply move their investments to countries with safer banking laws. That would have to be changed. So the leaders of Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Bank of America, Citibank and Chase Manhattan sought to “eliminate controls on banks in every nation on the planet — in one single move.”

To do this, Palast writes, they used “the Financial Services Agreement, an abstruse and benign addendum to the international trade agreements policed by the World Trade Organization.”

“Until the bankers began their play,” Palast continues, “the WTO agreements dealt simply with trade in goods—that is, my cars for your bananas. The new rules ginned-up by Summers and the banks would force all nations to accept trade in ‘bads’—toxic assets like financial derivatives.”

“Until the bankers’ re-draft of the FSA, each nation controlled and chartered the banks within their own borders. The new rules of the game would force every nation to open their markets to Citibank, JP Morgan and their derivatives ‘products.’ ”

“And all 156 nations in the WTO would have to smash down their own Glass-Steagall divisions between commercial savings banks and the investment banks that gamble with derivatives.”

The banks then strong-armed the member nations into abandoning their previous trade-in-goods deals by threatening to block international sales of the nations’ key exports. Every single bullied nation signed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The Case Against Larry Summers [View all] Jesus Malverde Sep 2013 OP
I love the constant feigning of ignorance. Or maybe it's not feigned at all. "I mean it's Guy Whitey Corngood Sep 2013 #1
Don't all government positions require that the person be able to treestar Sep 2013 #2
Wrong? trumad Sep 2013 #3
He's responsible for cratering the economy? treestar Sep 2013 #4
he's one of the main architects trumad Sep 2013 #10
of what? And under Clinton? treestar Sep 2013 #11
I'm not giving anyone a pass trumad Sep 2013 #17
Now I do treestar Sep 2013 #25
Can you state an actual postive case for why Summers would be the best choice? Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #5
No. But the abject hatred here treestar Sep 2013 #7
But 'abject hatred' is just your hyperbolic characterization. To say 'should not Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #13
I knew you'd work your one issue into this treestar Sep 2013 #14
I'm talking about things YOU have said and comparing them to what YOU Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #15
Amazing eh? trumad Sep 2013 #18
Not just hate, but 'abject hate' and the gasp that it surprises her, this abject Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #19
She really does not her history to the financial meltdown. trumad Sep 2013 #21
Most people probably wildly disagree about the financial meltdown treestar Sep 2013 #24
Oh there's the 'H' word Maven Sep 2013 #22
Well, dissenters are considered mentally ill in these parts now QC Sep 2013 #27
He's been 'building consensus' against the peons for years leftstreet Sep 2013 #6
What legislation and what bankruptcy modifications? treestar Sep 2013 #8
You defend him, but know nothing about him? leftstreet Sep 2013 #9
I don't pretend to know everything, as you do treestar Sep 2013 #12
end game questionseverything Sep 2013 #16
From what I've learned today of him treestar Sep 2013 #23
Needs some soap for those warrant46 Sep 2013 #28
Not this one. This is raw, unilateral, autocratic power. cthulu2016 Sep 2013 #20
When we all were calling for Roosevelt type responses to the upaloopa Sep 2013 #26
or to simplify the thesis.... whistler162 Sep 2013 #29
Summers is a horrible choice. Enthusiast Sep 2013 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Case Against Larry Su...»Reply #16