Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Woman Distracted by Texting Drives Her Car Into a Lake [View all]Uncle Joe
(65,319 posts)124. How big is the issue? 384 drownings is more than two Oklahoma City Bombings every year.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing
The Oklahoma City bombing was a domestic terrorist bomb attack on the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in downtown Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995. It would remain the most destructive act of terrorism in the United States until the September 11 attacks of 2001, six years later. The bombing claimed 168 lives[1] and injured more than 680 people.[2] The blast destroyed or damaged 324 buildings within a 16-block radius, destroyed or burned 86 cars, and shattered glass in 258 nearby buildings,[3][4] causing at least an estimated $652 million worth of damage.[5] Extensive rescue efforts were undertaken by local, state, federal, and worldwide agencies in the wake of the bombing, and substantial donations were received from across the country. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) activated eleven of its Urban Search and Rescue Task Forces, consisting of 665 rescue workers who assisted in rescue and recovery operations.[6][7]
Now I'm not suggesting every drowning victim would be saved by having a quicker and safer escape from a sinking automobile but most definitely some of them would.
If you don't have a breakdown of precise statistics attributing the primary cause of the drownings it's hard to quantify that.
We do have and should have laws requiring seat belt use and not driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs but they're all mitigating factors.
How many of those drownings occurred because the passengers couldn't exit their vehicles fast enough?
Even if you were driving under the influence or wearing your seat-belts was it a non, minor or major factor, in not be able to exit the vehicle?
As I stated above we should have laws for the public in safely operating vehicles, but the same holds true for the automobile manufacturers in producing as safe a car as possible and as I posted up thread, this wouldn't be rocket science for them.
You may look at the numbers as a minuscule amount, just a %, but if it was you or your family drowning or drowned because you or they couldn't exit the vehicle fast enough you might feel differently.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
138 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You're exactly right. Silent3 is responsible for America's foreign policy disasters.
Orrex
Sep 2013
#62
We did "fine" without cars too. Why not get rid of them? That solves drunk driving...
Silent3
Sep 2013
#67
Texting rather than phone calls will prove extremely valuable the next time WE have a major
kestrel91316
Sep 2013
#78
Note to self: cyclists deserve every consideration, but pedestrians can go fuck themselves
Orrex
Sep 2013
#65
Oh come on, apparently unaware of the dangers associated with texting and driving.
Jefferson23
Sep 2013
#7
I hope you're right..I read that and thought, wtf, she was not aware? lol n/t
Jefferson23
Sep 2013
#19
It is beyond me too..I don't get it since it is painfully obvious such a stupid and dangerous idea.
Jefferson23
Sep 2013
#31
Amazingly she had the presence of mind to text "Oh shit" as she was going over the cliff.
BlueStreak
Sep 2013
#15
I hate to seem insensitive, but at least it wasn't the other way around, with the
kestrel91316
Sep 2013
#81
Fog was a contributing factor but it really makes no difference as to why someone crashes
Uncle Joe
Sep 2013
#86
Good for you if don't live near water, cross bridges over water or experience flash flooding but
Uncle Joe
Sep 2013
#99
How big is the issue? 384 drownings is more than two Oklahoma City Bombings every year.
Uncle Joe
Sep 2013
#124
No it will cost car buyers $120 per car, and cars don't need to be retrofitted
Uncle Joe
Sep 2013
#132
After you explain how to operate roll down manual windows, can those people grasp the concept
Uncle Joe
Sep 2013
#100
It can and does happen either because of flash floods, bridge collapses, and any
Uncle Joe
Sep 2013
#73
Oh, I agree. Just rolling down the window is always preferable (and easier).
Buns_of_Fire
Sep 2013
#136
LOL. Yeah. Cranks windows is the inevitable solution to texting while driving.
Romulox
Sep 2013
#102
Apparently the "seperate issue" part went over your head, not to mention you didn't read
Uncle Joe
Sep 2013
#104
They should not add crank windows to all cars in case someone drives into the water while texting.
Romulox
Sep 2013
#122
Changing the world to make texting while driving (into a body of water!) safer is absurd. nt
Romulox
Sep 2013
#128