General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I thought DU was pro gay rights??? (Genuinely hurt) [View all]Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)It is a - a charming peccadillo? - of we night-owls, often offering up our best arguments in response to posts as we saw them at the time, only to realize in the morning that what we thought we saw wasn't really there.
And I, too, stand by my statement that people who most often feel a "need" to talk about how hard they campaigned for Obama are trying to push their "Dem creds" with all the sincerity of a door-to-door vacuum-cleaner salesman.
I think Bluestreak very much advocated ignoring Putin's behavior by saying, "And agreeing with what Putin wrote has no bearing whatsoever on any gay issues. He didn't write anything about gay issues in that column."
Again there is this notion that one should not consider the man behind the words, because these particular NYT's words "have no bearing whatsoever on any gay issues". And yet again, I wouldn't invite Jews to take to heart Hitler's writings on things that "have no bearing whatsoever on The Final Solution.
When there is a need to separate the man from the words, it is only because the man is suspect - which makes his words worthless.