Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
273. IDK what convo you are talking about. Also, the OP author is not the blog author. It is not spam.
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 03:03 AM
Sep 2013

And due to the way you formatted your reply, perhaps because of the device used, I cannot make heads or tails of who said what.

And you are still making the assumption that the OP author is the blog author. Deaniac is not here on DU.

I've gone over there to research this. The 'cash trap' accusation is in error, no matter how many times it is repeated.

I wonder why it is being brought upm instead of discussing the topic. It seems that posters are running away from the questions raised in the blog article.

It is the ideas in the blog that interest me, and the topic of the OP, not the personas. You responded to my answer to a poster who said they did not know who that was, and I answered with what I found on the blog itself. I spent a while, thinking about the ideas, going to all the embedded links and following those out.

Several serious charges have been made about the OP writer and blog writer, who are not the same person. One, that it is spam and being posted for money; two, that the blog author is a bigot, that is, a homophobe, when he is gay; and if you go to the link, there are comments where the blog author explains he had a change of heart over anger from Prop 8 passing in CA. I'm unsure if that is what you are referring as changed.

The blog author and the OP author have distinct writing styles. They are not the same person and the blog author lives in CA, not MI. Even if they were the same, and I have written and they are not, will we be calling Thom Hartmann and Alan Grayson spammers now for posting?

I will add an additional point, that the OP writer knows better than to post more than four paragraphs. The blog writer would post all of his material, if he needed the views. He was at Kos for a long time until he decided to start his own blog.

I contend it is the ideas at the link that is found objectionable, not these other things. No one has spoken seriously to them it has just been dismissed out of hand. He's not a RWer but is a pragmatic Democrat, just as Howard Dean was and still is. Dean has made statements as of late that might not be considered Left enough. But he is a pragmatist.

The blog expresses what DU used to be about, helping people through the Democratic Party and good governance.

The link in the article of the OP leads to many links he did not write and are not garbage. His conclusions are his own, and I agree with many, some I don't. They are all good food for thought.

We must get to the end result of actions, back to taking care of people and not be so much about ideology or winning as to disregard real people.

I have had to deal IRL with people on the Left and Right who were so focused on their win, or their ideology, that real people died. They felt they were correct and did not see the human beings that suffered from their rigid postitions. I cannot support this and I feel this is part of what the blog author means. Like the words here:

Easy To Be Hard

by Three Dog Night

How can people be so heartless
How can people be so cruel
Easy to be hard, easy to be cold

How can people have no feelings
How can they ignore their friends
Easy to be proud, easy to say no

Especially people who care about strangers
Who care about evil and social injustice
Do you only care about bleeding crowd...


I think Deaniac is much like Howard Dean. And Barney Frank said:

Understand that the more deeply you hold your ideals, the more you are morally obligated to be pragmatic... Idealism without pragmatism is just a way to flatter your ego.

When I was very young, that word pragmatism seemed like a cop-out. And when I first read that statement, it was mildly offensive to me again.

Then I thought of what I'd seen and how the 'idealism' of some cost lives of those who they thought were worth the sacrifice for their utopian vision. I can't do that.

That is what the OP's link is about, compassion. It speaks of the millions who have been helped, instead of a perfect plan according to ideology. And what Obama did for women and others, that are real people.

No one seems to want to talk about ideas here now, just taking sides, making accusations and not talking about IRL solutions. It makes DU unproductive and is not why I joined DU or why I became a Democrat.

Peace Out.

Liberals Without A Conscience [View all] michigandem58 Sep 2013 OP
This should be fun. 11 Bravo Sep 2013 #1
yes creon Sep 2013 #133
If sitting on my big ol' deck enjoying a beautiful sunset... WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #143
having a Sierra Nevada Porter here.... NRaleighLiberal Sep 2013 #225
Hello, NRL! WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #226
I will be at West Point at Eno Park doing a garden talk 10-12 tomorrow! NRaleighLiberal Sep 2013 #231
Nice. We'll be riding the Neuse River Greenway. WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #234
If you pick your house because of your neighbors..... daleanime Sep 2013 #2
I wonder why the blog owner refused to vote for Obama? Rex Sep 2013 #3
The OP quotes that shitty blog so much, I wonder if it belongs to them? Electric Monk Sep 2013 #6
No idea. Just think it is funny that a liberal hater that didn't vote Rex Sep 2013 #11
Election Night Liveblog, Through Twitter (Tuesday, November 06, 2012) struggle4progress Sep 2013 #182
http://www.thepeoplesview.net/2012_11_01_archive.html Rex Sep 2013 #185
Ask your Tech Support guy to teach you how to scroll down a web page: you may have a mouse button struggle4progress Sep 2013 #194
So in other words, you have no proof of anything just links. Rex Sep 2013 #196
Are you seriously unable to find that quote at the link provided?... SidDithers Sep 2013 #222
Hey if the guy doesn't want to vote for Obama, yet merely endorse him Rex Sep 2013 #235
I found it... Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2013 #282
Kewl so you found proof that this guy voted for Obama! Rex Sep 2013 #286
Yes you are... Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2013 #294
!! Number23 Sep 2013 #318
Nope. The shitty blogger is in CA. KamaAina Sep 2013 #77
Why not? Not all people who use States in usernames are in those States. Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #97
Usually that's because they've moved. KamaAina Sep 2013 #105
approval not required. creon Sep 2013 #123
clear? HangOnKids Sep 2013 #189
It's his blog. The only reason he is here is to generate advertising hits on his blog. nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2013 #183
Youre absolutely right. bunnies Sep 2013 #254
Can you cite where he says he voted for Romney? nt msanthrope Sep 2013 #23
No just where he wouldn't vote for Obama. Rex Sep 2013 #28
Still waiting for you to cite that......nt msanthrope Sep 2013 #59
I said I could not cite that he voted for Mitt. Rex Sep 2013 #66
I did not miss that part. You made two claims, though. You cannot cite one, but what about msanthrope Sep 2013 #67
Sure thing! Here ya go! Nice Rec btw. Rex Sep 2013 #75
Just to set the record straight (or complete) deaniac83 Sep 2013 #90
Hey if you refuse to vote for Obama and say 'good riddance' then who am I to complain? Rex Sep 2013 #93
Nope not gonna hide it deaniac83 Sep 2013 #96
No you seem desperate in getting caught. Rex Sep 2013 #98
Strange that he hasn't posted here till now. That's a long time to lurk. Autumn Sep 2013 #110
IKR? Rex Sep 2013 #115
Very illuminating. Autumn Sep 2013 #117
Good post. Puglover Sep 2013 #288
So you get a path, the rest get your wrath? Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #99
Thank You, Rex. bvar22 Sep 2013 #100
I wonder who informed him so fast? Rex Sep 2013 #101
I think he finally became self-aware. bunnies Sep 2013 #259
You lurk these boards now? PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #108
got it in one creon Sep 2013 #136
Progress is impossible without change and those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything freshwest Sep 2013 #322
That's your craptastic blog? Thanks, I know who to ignore now LondonReign2 Sep 2013 #211
No need. He said he wouldn't be posting anymore. WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #219
And yet the same anti-liberal continues to link to that shitty blog LondonReign2 Sep 2013 #246
Yep. And runs away rather than engaging. WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #250
2007 with a later post explaining that he was voting for Obama in 2008? msanthrope Sep 2013 #276
I thought not voting for Obama was the same as voting for Romney. Marr Sep 2013 #119
IKR!?!?! Rex Sep 2013 #126
You conclude from a 2007 post that the person voted for Romney in 2012? struggle4progress Sep 2013 #141
Well there is no proof that they voted at all, but carry on! Rex Sep 2013 #209
Wow- it's amazing how forgiving you can be when it's someone you agree with. Marr Sep 2013 #267
I've never used the term emoprog struggle4progress Sep 2013 #269
Forget emprogs, Spandan's the emotional one. WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #261
In 2007? nt msanthrope Sep 2013 #275
I may be mistaken, but he did not say that he did. panzerfaust Sep 2013 #45
voting is a civic duty. creon Sep 2013 #137
How Obama Turnout is Creaming Romney - Monday, October 15, 2012 struggle4progress Sep 2013 #184
What a Stalinist you are MNBrewer Sep 2013 #203
I'll go against the grain here. Some are too stupid to be trusted with a ballot 7962 Sep 2013 #277
I've said this before and i'll say it again.... tomp Sep 2013 #278
Maybe he went third party. KamaAina Sep 2013 #79
Or maybe he decided not to vote at all. Rex Sep 2013 #85
Voting for "Liberals" like Jill Stein or Roseanne is not consistent with that site. bvar22 Sep 2013 #106
Jill Stein! Candidate for the 0.36% struggle4progress Sep 2013 #221
"I support President Obama because he is the most trust worthy politician I have come to see struggle4progress Sep 2013 #146
did he? creon Sep 2013 #131
See post #86. Rex Sep 2013 #134
"I'm throwing my support behind Barack Obama" struggle4progress Sep 2013 #142
... Rex Sep 2013 #144
"I support President Obama because he is the most trust worthy politician I have come to see struggle4progress Sep 2013 #149
... Rex Sep 2013 #150
Your link is from 2007, mine from 2008 and 2011. He changed his mind, as (of course) you are aware struggle4progress Sep 2013 #151
SO he says. And he still did not vote for him. Rex Sep 2013 #153
Your quote is from 2007. He changed his mind struggle4progress Sep 2013 #173
Endorsing is not voting for Rex Sep 2013 #175
Link? Just repeating something again and again shows nothing struggle4progress Sep 2013 #176
You mean just like you are doing over and over? Rex Sep 2013 #178
I love these threads Capt. Obvious Sep 2013 #4
BRAVO !! Sand Wind Sep 2013 #5
Posting -- anonymously -- from a Crap Blog to another message board is courageous? WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #12
Well. He saved a kitten from a tree this morning too. Squinch Sep 2013 #87
:-) WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #109
Who is Spandan Chakrabarti (the author)? cyberswede Sep 2013 #7
Something from another poster. Rex Sep 2013 #17
He's a former DUer? Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #29
Yes the liberal bashers love him. Rex Sep 2013 #31
Liberal bashers? Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #37
Then why not vote for Obama when he ran for office? Rex Sep 2013 #38
Well it appears that he supports many of Obama's policies which I support Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #41
Yes he said it was Obama's view on LGBT Rex Sep 2013 #46
Well that's interesting... Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #51
Obama was not doing near enough and hence his refusal to vote for Obama. Rex Sep 2013 #52
He supported Edwards until Edwards dropped out, then switched to Obama; he had been angry about struggle4progress Sep 2013 #214
"... I didn’t decide to call myself a Democrat until I saw Senator Barack Obama on television struggle4progress Sep 2013 #186
... Rex Sep 2013 #190
TLDR, eh? It's in the fifth paragraph struggle4progress Sep 2013 #197
So you cannot just directly link to where you want to go? Rex Sep 2013 #201
That's by Tien, not Spandan. (n/t) WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #195
OK. Here: "... if we get this president's back as he has always had ours, if we vote, if we get struggle4progress Sep 2013 #204
Is that where that obnoxious "president's back" originated? WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #212
Ya but does it really matter anymore? Rex Sep 2013 #206
That they're so quick to defend... WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #216
WillyT said it best in his thread on the topic. Rex Sep 2013 #218
WillyT does have a way with words. WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #230
He posted IN this thread. He's not a former DUer. He's a DUer. Just doesn't post much. nt MADem Sep 2013 #307
He's an Executive Assistant/Fundraiser pursuing an online degree... WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #18
So he is a former troll that is getting recs from current DUers? Rex Sep 2013 #26
I haven't done a DU search... WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #50
The BOGers are in love with a guy that refused to vote for Obama? Rex Sep 2013 #56
I know. That's what's so damn funny. WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #72
He posted on old DU. Here is his profile Autumn Sep 2013 #71
Ah, there he is. Our little Spandan. WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #91
He showed up instantly and replied to me after I exposed his flippancy Rex Sep 2013 #103
Wow. Spandan in the flesh... WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #114
Someone in this thread no doubt. Rex Sep 2013 #118
Meanie. WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #121
Well at least he came in here with a course correction. Rex Sep 2013 #122
Especially for Obama. WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #125
Yeah I bet the POTUS is breathing a sigh of relief. Rex Sep 2013 #129
Is the OP of this thread the same person (deaniac83)? cyberswede Sep 2013 #32
Don't know. Perhaps. WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #53
I expect so. He posts nothing but drivel from that blog. /nt Marr Sep 2013 #135
A pattern is developing in which michigandem58 puts up posts with links to The Peoples View. Maedhros Sep 2013 #148
Back in the good ol' days attacks on "the left"... WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #165
A blowhard with a high opinion of his own thoughts. Starry Messenger Sep 2013 #22
So that's a new thing here? HappyMe Sep 2013 #49
Usually the other blowhards have some stature and gravitas. Starry Messenger Sep 2013 #55
A blowhard is a blowhard. HappyMe Sep 2013 #57
This seems to have come full circle. :) Starry Messenger Sep 2013 #60
Yes, it has. HappyMe Sep 2013 #65
uh. no. NOBODY here has demonstrated much gravitas or stature Pretzel_Warrior Sep 2013 #88
Sez the person with 13 hides. WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #228
scholar on social policy and barrista. KG Sep 2013 #70
HA! nashville_brook Sep 2013 #264
Here you go: freshwest Sep 2013 #89
Any links for Spandan's attacks on Krugman, Kuttner, Stiglitz, Baker, et al.? WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #155
Well said, freshwest. Thanks! sheshe2 Sep 2013 #268
i dont know if you noted it SwampG8r Sep 2013 #270
IDK what convo you are talking about. Also, the OP author is not the blog author. It is not spam. freshwest Sep 2013 #273
not here on du? SwampG8r Sep 2013 #281
You find one thing, and still don't answer my post, for whatever reason. freshwest Sep 2013 #304
Actually, he said he was updating Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2013 #284
+1 nt MADem Sep 2013 #308
That is a really crappy blog. MuseRider Sep 2013 #8
I think it brings an interesting prersepective Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #13
I agree. HappyMe Sep 2013 #54
Sounds pretty much like an echo chamber to me. MuseRider Sep 2013 #62
Spandan's Crap Blog is nothing BUT an echo chamber. WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #63
Unrec. PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #9
Thanks for posting that. It is right on. I responded to a poster in another OP who seems bluestate10 Sep 2013 #10
Let me ask you something cali Sep 2013 #14
The irony here is that the blog owner refused to vote for Obama. Rex Sep 2013 #21
Barack Obama: A Cautious Endorsement (Friday, February 01, 2008) struggle4progress Sep 2013 #169
... Rex Sep 2013 #171
You keep posting that tired, cherry picked statement Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2013 #285
Dream on. Rex Sep 2013 #287
I am loving your posts in this thread!! Number23 Sep 2013 #320
Thanks! Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2013 #321
DU rec... SidDithers Sep 2013 #15
I'm digging at people on the Left that have suddenly found the anarchist Rand Paul and the statist V Sand Wind Sep 2013 #16
Who are you replying to? Who are you quoting? cyberswede Sep 2013 #27
It's a quote from the source... Sand Wind Sep 2013 #30
The sepcious source aside, do you feel that the quote applies to DUers? cyberswede Sep 2013 #36
K & effin' R!!!!! Tarheel_Dem Sep 2013 #19
Many members who voted for tough stance on Syria now oppose military action ProSense Sep 2013 #20
^^^ THAT THREAD NEEDS REC'S michigandem58 Sep 2013 #40
WTH? There you go screwing with the magic again. Sigh... freshwest Sep 2013 #164
Cognitive dissonance and selective moral relativity: No other way to support president Obama panzerfaust Sep 2013 #24
Nice... SidDithers Sep 2013 #74
You shoulda seen the one before this one... freshwest Sep 2013 #167
I am so pleased that, at long last, the admins "have your number"..... MADem Sep 2013 #313
Praise be to Skinner! Long overdue banning for an extreme Obama hater. Thanks for the link. freshwest Sep 2013 #314
Shown the door for being an "Obama hater" as per Skinner Number23 Sep 2013 #319
I don't know.... MADem Sep 2013 #325
More straw man trollery from that crap blog. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #25
It is funny watching supposed hardcore Obama supporters Rex Sep 2013 #34
You have posted the same thing Bobbie Jo Sep 2013 #68
Please, here ya go...twist away! Rex Sep 2013 #76
Was that so hard? Bobbie Jo Sep 2013 #80
Of course you do, hurts don't it? Rex Sep 2013 #83
No, not in the least. Bobbie Jo Sep 2013 #104
Yep you keep up with the narrative. Rex Sep 2013 #107
? Bobbie Jo Sep 2013 #160
I've noticed you always go straight to playground insults when someone calls your bluff Marr Sep 2013 #138
Are you taking notes too? Bobbie Jo Sep 2013 #166
And again, no answer. Marr Sep 2013 #193
What "answer?" Bobbie Jo Sep 2013 #224
Try to calm down. Marr Sep 2013 #238
I'm not into gotcha game playing. Bobbie Jo Sep 2013 #248
Double ugh. Puglover Sep 2013 #289
he/she is certainly not a liberal, but the writer of that shitty blog has no conscience cali Sep 2013 #33
Please explain how your commentary is any different at all than Ann Coulter or Sean Hannity? Douglas Carpenter Sep 2013 #35
The blog author supports: Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #39
The blog owner did NOT support Obama. Rex Sep 2013 #42
You told me that above. Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #44
the blog author is a serial liar and no liberal. cali Sep 2013 #43
He supports those policies I mentioned Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #47
Just not the man that came up with the policies. Rex Sep 2013 #58
merely trying to smear the blogger without treestar Sep 2013 #73
Excellent point treestar Andy823 Sep 2013 #92
prove the lie creon Sep 2013 #127
Dick Cheney and the entire Log Cabin Club were early supporters of marriage Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #111
What about the ACA Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #113
I think Cheney and other unscrupulous folks would mouth 'support' for anything Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #229
So why hasn't he or other republicans mouth supported those policies? Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #240
Romney and the Republicans designed it, bvar22 Sep 2013 #233
So why is every Republican in congress opposed to it? Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #239
Because Republicans are reflexive assholes LondonReign2 Sep 2013 #257
This is just so stupid, it's not worth debating Oilwellian Sep 2013 #48
Come on... ocpagu Sep 2013 #61
This D Bag in the Curly Hair is the one who turned Chile over to the fascists warrant46 Sep 2013 #132
Awesome post. sagat Sep 2013 #64
This message was self-deleted by its author HangOnKids Sep 2013 #78
The blog owner sure seems to have a flipant view of politics. Rex Sep 2013 #81
Good point about the executive orders treestar Sep 2013 #69
bloggers without a brain cell hfojvt Sep 2013 #82
Meh. It's a screed that insults a bunch of DUers, posted as a link to another blog Maedhros Sep 2013 #84
Nailed It! bvar22 Sep 2013 #112
A liberal without a conscience. Rex Sep 2013 #86
Ah, if only this were a perfect world we wouldn't have to discuss this demosincebirth Sep 2013 #94
"...conducts surveillance operations within the law and the Constitution..." OnyxCollie Sep 2013 #95
I was searching my mind for a word to describe this post. zeemike Sep 2013 #147
It's harvesting low-hanging fruit. OnyxCollie Sep 2013 #181
Starts out with a lie as a premise and gets worse from there MNBrewer Sep 2013 #102
fail creon Sep 2013 #124
You are so funny! HangOnKids Sep 2013 #210
The irony level of the words about community coming after a divisive screed like Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #116
OP is all about building community MNBrewer Sep 2013 #128
I agree creon Sep 2013 #120
fail MNBrewer Sep 2013 #130
Are you supposed to be the mythological ruler of Thebes... WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #139
Actually, that's a typo. QC Sep 2013 #145
:-) MuseRider Sep 2013 #152
Hi! Good to see you again! QC Sep 2013 #158
Well, he did use "ignoble" upthread... WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #159
Worst Fucking Blog Ever. 99Forever Sep 2013 #140
If you don't support our NSA and the war on Syria one hundred percent . . . another_liberal Sep 2013 #154
if you buy garbage like that you might be stupid stupidicus Sep 2013 #156
Remember the old saying about pointing fingers? DeSwiss Sep 2013 #157
This sounds an awful lot like the right-wingers who accused us of loving Saddam Hussein Bjorn Against Sep 2013 #161
Wow...is Obama up for re-election again or something... joeybee12 Sep 2013 #162
Obama for 2016 !! Sand Wind Sep 2013 #168
Bizarre rant AgingAmerican Sep 2013 #163
Those who call Democrats spineless, well, there's the liberal with a backbone you said you wanted! freshwest Sep 2013 #170
OP/author writes "troll". "troll"? OP is blog owner wanting advertising hits, hence provocation. nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2013 #172
Notice how the OP-troll-blogger posts provocation and doesn't reply. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2013 #174
Funny how he got some supposedly hardcore Obama supporters to rec this thread Rex Sep 2013 #177
He spams DU mailboxes for recs. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2013 #180
Wow. How tacky. WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #191
Got to keep the chattering class outraged at their own party. Rex Sep 2013 #199
I've heard that, but don't remember who coined it. WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #208
Well imagine that, it is a slam at liberalism! Rex Sep 2013 #213
They don't care if it's used properly... WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #223
nattering nabob of negatism SwampG8r Sep 2013 #271
The core of liberalism is NOT blindly supporting militarism and corporatism....... marmar Sep 2013 #179
Look at how hard he supporters are playing CYA in this thread! Rex Sep 2013 #192
Not bombing Syria is for "the greater good, the common good." WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #187
The B team is out to prop this up HangOnKids Sep 2013 #198
B? Hell they on the F team by now. Rex Sep 2013 #202
Well shit I was trying to give them SOME credit HangOnKids Sep 2013 #205
I think this OP is vindication for we on the left fascisthunter Sep 2013 #242
I'm laughing my ass off at some of the replies directed towards me HangOnKids Sep 2013 #243
they are dishonest unconscionable goofballs fascisthunter Sep 2013 #245
While the Heathers are passing notes in Social Studies. Bobbie Jo Sep 2013 #256
"B" for Binka... SidDithers Sep 2013 #295
K&R!! rury Sep 2013 #188
Ah yes, "The Peoples' View" Scootaloo Sep 2013 #200
Oh, ShitBlog again? LondonReign2 Sep 2013 #207
ROFL. nt alsame Sep 2013 #215
Exactly like Wall St investors. raouldukelives Sep 2013 #217
Pissing off all the right people... SidDithers Sep 2013 #220
... Rex Sep 2013 #237
If by ''right people'' you mean Democrats sick of the status quo, yes. Octafish Sep 2013 #290
Ah yes. LWolf Sep 2013 #227
Aww.. Someone needs attention so much even negative attention will suffice Fumesucker Sep 2013 #232
I've never been accused of being very perceptive, and rightly so. LanternWaste Sep 2013 #236
Lousy Gamblers HangOnKids Sep 2013 #249
thank you for outing yourself and those cheerleading this fascisthunter Sep 2013 #241
It's impossible to please some people shenmue Sep 2013 #244
How would Spandan know how a liberal thinks? NuclearDem Sep 2013 #247
I have only one thing to say about "the peoples view" blog: scarletwoman Sep 2013 #251
A blanket accusation that those who arrive at opinions that differ from yours ... markpkessinger Sep 2013 #252
I also got "rec?"-spammed by this poster. xfundy Sep 2013 #253
I wonder if the Admins support that. WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #258
Doubt it. xfundy Sep 2013 #262
I guess I could ATA, but I imagine the response will be... WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #292
Apparently his conscience tells him that the way to deal with evildoers eridani Sep 2013 #255
Ah the People's Spew..... neverforget Sep 2013 #260
If you think that torture should not be prosecuted, you're sick. grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #263
all I got from this Eko Sep 2013 #265
this writer's "community" Precisely Sep 2013 #266
i doubt you would SwampG8r Sep 2013 #272
Another OP for the compost heap. blackspade Sep 2013 #274
Because there is a contingent here that loves to rec Rex Sep 2013 #280
Very few wingnuts hate progressives more passionately QC Sep 2013 #283
And they keep coming back even when TSed. Puglover Sep 2013 #291
And they're apparently allowed to come back, QC Sep 2013 #293
If you look at the profile of rec, you will see a lot of old DU...so maybe you should not Sand Wind Sep 2013 #297
Old tired and well known to us Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #302
I haven't the slightest idea Puglover Sep 2013 #303
Ok I will try to rephrase Sand Wind Sep 2013 #306
I have been on this website for over 10 years. Puglover Sep 2013 #309
What mean Tsed ? Sand Wind Sep 2013 #310
It's actually a colloquial term from DU2. Puglover Sep 2013 #311
Ok I see, but most of the people who "rec" are long time DU'ers, some with hundred of Sand Wind Sep 2013 #312
There have been people banned for being trolls after tens of thousands of posts Fumesucker Sep 2013 #323
Ok, I see, thanks ! Nt Sand Wind Sep 2013 #324
What a steaming pile of horse shit. Safetykitten Sep 2013 #279
Holy trolly. Maven Sep 2013 #296
Yeah, I just noticed who the OP is. Raksha Sep 2013 #300
Post removed Post removed Sep 2013 #298
To whoever wrote this: SHAME ON YOU! Raksha Sep 2013 #299
What are Obama's "sins" pray tell, and are you sure you're in the right place? nt MADem Sep 2013 #315
"the most effective liberal to have entered the White House in nearly a century" Deep13 Sep 2013 #301
K & R Scurrilous Sep 2013 #305
Yum yum yum... Hell Hath No Fury Sep 2013 #316
DAYUM!! Number23 Sep 2013 #317
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Liberals Without A Consci...»Reply #273