Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Many members who voted for tough stance on Syria now oppose military action [View all]FarCenter
(19,429 posts)29. The law exists; Kerry's quote is fairly consident with it; Branigan's is not.
In an opening statement Tuesday before the House Armed Services Committee, Secretary of State John F. Kerry told lawmakers that they had effectively already voted for the use of force in Syria.
You have already spoken to this. Your word is on the line, too. You passed the Syria Accountability Act," Kerry said. "And that act clearly states that Syrias chemical weapons threaten the security of the Middle East. Thats in plain writing. Its in the act. You voted for it. Weve already decided that these chemical weapons are important to the security of our nation.
You have already spoken to this. Your word is on the line, too. You passed the Syria Accountability Act," Kerry said. "And that act clearly states that Syrias chemical weapons threaten the security of the Middle East. Thats in plain writing. Its in the act. You voted for it. Weve already decided that these chemical weapons are important to the security of our nation.
Where in the quote, or in the text of the law, does it "effectively" authorize "the use of force in Syria"?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Many members who voted for tough stance on Syria now oppose military action [View all]
ProSense
Sep 2013
OP
You mean there's politics at play here? Well, I never. Everybody hearts Putin & Assad now. YAY!!!
Tarheel_Dem
Sep 2013
#9
Well, obviously the only people who matter heart Pooty & Assad. "Everybody" was a bit broad.
Tarheel_Dem
Sep 2013
#13
I don't see wording in the summary of H.R.1828 that authorizes the use of force against Syria?
FarCenter
Sep 2013
#21
Ah! So it is Bill Branigan who is making stuff up and putting words in Kerry's mouth.
FarCenter
Sep 2013
#27
The law exists; Kerry's quote is fairly consident with it; Branigan's is not.
FarCenter
Sep 2013
#29
HRW is a subsidiary of the US foreign affairs, media, and investment banking establishment.
FarCenter
Sep 2013
#30
“Wouldn’t want to create an impression that HRW is not interested in what Snowden has to say.”
FarCenter
Sep 2013
#32
"It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime...
ProSense
Sep 2013
#36
which says nothing about the use of the military action on our part to do it
stupidicus
Sep 2013
#37