Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
3. "They shouldn't draw a lesson that we haven't struck, to think we won't strike Iran."
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 11:22 AM
Sep 2013

That's promising.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No shit. Like that lesson is lost on anyone. Just like Iraq and Libya - leveymg Sep 2013 #1
There is ProSense Sep 2013 #2
Regime change has been the goal alsame Sep 2013 #4
The Iranian President has been in office "since 1953"? ProSense Sep 2013 #5
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that alsame Sep 2013 #6
What does that have to do with the claim the current policy is "regime" change? n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #7
Please read the link, and tell me how the current policy differs from the 1996 Clean Break plan. leveymg Sep 2013 #10
No, show me where "regime" change is the current policy. ProSense Sep 2013 #11
The broad outlines of recent history (2003-present) establish that well enough. leveymg Sep 2013 #12
You can't show it, can you? n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #13
OK. Here's a link that touches on it. But, you still should read the 1996 Clean Break document. leveymg Sep 2013 #14
Sorry - gave you the wrong link. Here it is: leveymg Sep 2013 #15
Got anything that shows the current policy is "regime" change? n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #16
The current policy is to bleed Syria, disarm it, and then break it up. leveymg Sep 2013 #17
Still can't produce evidence that the current policy is "regme" change in Iran, huh? n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #18
Did you read the Clean Break plan? That's what it says. Please comment on that. leveymg Sep 2013 #19
This is obfuscation. ProSense Sep 2013 #20
Current US policy reflects both a broad strategic plan (regime change) and part tactical practical leveymg Sep 2013 #21
Still no evidence, huh? n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #22
What might constitute evidence to you? leveymg Sep 2013 #23
An official document from the Obama administration. n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #24
I am not Edward Snowden or J Assange. Please put in your order through the proper channels: leveymg Sep 2013 #26
LOL! Why didn't you just admit that you were stating an opinion, not a fact? n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #27
The long-term strategy of regime change against Iran is a fact. The particulars are more fluid and leveymg Sep 2013 #28
The claim that current policy is "regime" change is not a fact, and ProSense Sep 2013 #30
BTW, here are two WH statements ProSense Sep 2013 #25
Addressed immediately above. leveymg Sep 2013 #29
"They shouldn't draw a lesson that we haven't struck, to think we won't strike Iran." rug Sep 2013 #3
Oh, joy! More saber rattling from Obama. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2013 #8
The question is ProSense Sep 2013 #9
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama says Syria deal cou...»Reply #3