General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: to those giving Obama full credit for disarming Syria without violence, I would remind you... [View all]BumRushDaShow
(166,082 posts)Exactly.
But I disagree about this sort of thing being "seat of pants". In the world of negotiations (and I have taken many many courses in it and participated in many negotiating sessions over the past 30 years), you aim for "win-win". That's not "seat of pants". It's quite the opposite and requires alot of behind the scenes work on the final presentation because all sides have parties who are NOT right there in the room, and those are the folks who need to be convinced that they can go home "satisfied" with the agreement.
For folks to not acknowledge a "fake" as part of an arsenal (pun not intended) of "tools" as a means to an end, is sad. However on the real world stage, if you are going to do such a strategy, you need to be able to have everything in place to back it up if it doesn't work.
The one thing regarding bases is that many of them HAVE closed. The bigger issue is to what to do with those folks when the come home and that is where we have the GOP blocking every means for creating jobs other than in the MIC. And that is why we need the electorate to get those folks removed from office so we can bring back manufacturing and the public sector.
Talking nonsense about "pom poms" is not what is needed to get the electorate out in off-year elections and to participate in elections in general. Not just in Presidential election years, but EVERY year.