Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
25. BTW, here are two WH statements
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 04:16 PM
Sep 2013

2009:

Statement by President Barack Obama on Iran

Thirty years ago today, the American Embassy in Tehran was seized. The 444 days that began on November 4, 1979 deeply affected the lives of courageous Americans who were unjustly held hostage, and we owe these Americans and their families our gratitude for their extraordinary service and sacrifice.

This event helped set the United States and Iran on a path of sustained suspicion, mistrust, and confrontation. I have made it clear that the United States of America wants to move beyond this past, and seeks a relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran based upon mutual interests and mutual respect. We do not interfere in Iran’s internal affairs. We have condemned terrorist attacks against Iran. We have recognized Iran’s international right to peaceful nuclear power. We have demonstrated our willingness to take confidence-building steps along with others in the international community. We have accepted a proposal by the International Atomic Energy Agency to meet Iran’s request for assistance in meeting the medical needs of its people. We have made clear that if Iran lives up to the obligations that every nation has, it will have a path to a more prosperous and productive relationship with the international community.

Iran must choose. We have heard for thirty years what the Iranian government is against; the question, now, is what kind of future it is for. The American people have great respect for the people of Iran and their rich history. The world continues to bear witness to their powerful calls for justice, and their courageous pursuit of universal rights. It is time for the Iranian government to decide whether it wants to focus on the past, or whether it will make the choices that will open the door to greater opportunity, prosperity, and justice for its people.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/statement-president-barack-obama-iran


August 2013:

Statement by the Press Secretary on the Inauguration of the President of the Islamic Republic of Iran

On the occasion of Dr. Hojjatoleslam Hassan Rouhani’s inauguration today as the Islamic Republic of Iran’s seventh president, we again congratulate the Iranian people for making their voices heard during Iran’s election. We note that President Rouhani recognized his election represented a call by the Iranian people for change, and we hope the new Iranian government will heed the will of the voters by making choices that will lead to a better life for the Iranian people. The inauguration of President Rouhani presents an opportunity for Iran to act quickly to resolve the international community’s deep concerns over Iran’s nuclear program. Should this new government choose to engage substantively and seriously to meet its international obligations and find a peaceful solution to this issue, it will find a willing partner in the United States.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/08/04/statement-press-secretary-inauguration-president-islamic-republic-iran


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No shit. Like that lesson is lost on anyone. Just like Iraq and Libya - leveymg Sep 2013 #1
There is ProSense Sep 2013 #2
Regime change has been the goal alsame Sep 2013 #4
The Iranian President has been in office "since 1953"? ProSense Sep 2013 #5
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that alsame Sep 2013 #6
What does that have to do with the claim the current policy is "regime" change? n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #7
Please read the link, and tell me how the current policy differs from the 1996 Clean Break plan. leveymg Sep 2013 #10
No, show me where "regime" change is the current policy. ProSense Sep 2013 #11
The broad outlines of recent history (2003-present) establish that well enough. leveymg Sep 2013 #12
You can't show it, can you? n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #13
OK. Here's a link that touches on it. But, you still should read the 1996 Clean Break document. leveymg Sep 2013 #14
Sorry - gave you the wrong link. Here it is: leveymg Sep 2013 #15
Got anything that shows the current policy is "regime" change? n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #16
The current policy is to bleed Syria, disarm it, and then break it up. leveymg Sep 2013 #17
Still can't produce evidence that the current policy is "regme" change in Iran, huh? n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #18
Did you read the Clean Break plan? That's what it says. Please comment on that. leveymg Sep 2013 #19
This is obfuscation. ProSense Sep 2013 #20
Current US policy reflects both a broad strategic plan (regime change) and part tactical practical leveymg Sep 2013 #21
Still no evidence, huh? n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #22
What might constitute evidence to you? leveymg Sep 2013 #23
An official document from the Obama administration. n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #24
I am not Edward Snowden or J Assange. Please put in your order through the proper channels: leveymg Sep 2013 #26
LOL! Why didn't you just admit that you were stating an opinion, not a fact? n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #27
The long-term strategy of regime change against Iran is a fact. The particulars are more fluid and leveymg Sep 2013 #28
The claim that current policy is "regime" change is not a fact, and ProSense Sep 2013 #30
BTW, here are two WH statements ProSense Sep 2013 #25
Addressed immediately above. leveymg Sep 2013 #29
"They shouldn't draw a lesson that we haven't struck, to think we won't strike Iran." rug Sep 2013 #3
Oh, joy! More saber rattling from Obama. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2013 #8
The question is ProSense Sep 2013 #9
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama says Syria deal cou...»Reply #25