Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: People are hurting out there [View all]jtuck004
(15,882 posts)28. Nor can they eat finger pointing. 'Course, they will have less food to worry about soon...
SNAP Benefits Will Be Cut for All Participants in November 2013
The 2009 Recovery Acts temporary boost to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits is scheduled to end on November 1, 2013, resulting in a benefit cut for every SNAP household. For families of three, the cut will be $29 a month a total of $319 for November 2013 through September 2014, the remaining months of fiscal year 2014.[2] Thats a serious loss, especially in light of the very low amount of basic SNAP benefits. Without the Recovery Acts boost, SNAP benefits will average less than $1.40 per person per meal in 2014. (See Table 2 for estimates of the size of the SNAP cut in each state in fiscal year 2014.) Nationally, the total cut is estimated to be $5 billion in fiscal year 2014.
...
Here
The Recovery Act
On February 13, 2009, in direct response to the economic crisis and at the urging of President Obama, Congress passed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 -- commonly referred to as the "stimulus" or the "stimulus package." Four days later, the President signed the Recovery Act into law. The three immediate goals of the Recovery Act are:
...
Here.
Given that Obama has made very public statements about his belief that he doesn't need Congress to authorize shooting missiles, maybe he ought to declare war against hunger and shoot food into neighborhoods. After all, he did tell the bankers, among them organizations that donated heavily to his first Presidential election campaign. that he was protecting them, and then backed it up with trillions for them to play with and profit from. Seems like everyone else should be treated just as well as the people profiting from the foreclosure of the homes of 10 million American families and the tragedy that follows them.
Though I am sure someone thinks that him telling the bankers he is standing between them "and the pitchforks" was probably some Republican projecting his voice...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

You are defending less food for poor people. You are defending a corruption that kills.
woo me with science
Sep 2013
#33
Nor can they eat finger pointing. 'Course, they will have less food to worry about soon...
jtuck004
Sep 2013
#28
Are you trying to imply that the corporate Democratic and Republican parties *aren't* a problem?
woo me with science
Sep 2013
#19
The old company store model. They never change their goals, and rarely their methods.
Egalitarian Thug
Sep 2013
#41
I would see the best deals in the third week of the month for some places to attract customers.
Spitfire of ATJ
Sep 2013
#10
I read a lot of negative propaganda on DU, Obama caused this to happen, Obama did
Thinkingabout
Sep 2013
#32
we need democrats that have not been bought by the 1%. Those of us who complain do want to see
liberal_at_heart
Sep 2013
#38
If you want to see Democrats in office make our Democrat president strong. Tear him down
Thinkingabout
Sep 2013
#42
So far what have you accomplished by doing it you way or working for the GOP to
Thinkingabout
Sep 2013
#58