Think about this when you see someone here calling another a pedophile or rapist apologist or

[boston bean]

67. Oh Lumberjack, doth prtest to much, do you not see your

former host linking to posts in HoF in that same thread? Surveillance much?

Twisting churning, turning..... anything to get it to go away after it was called out by Quantesss, who doesn't even participate regularly in HoF... If you think this is all about HoF members, I suggest you re-read her thread, and the responses before the poster deleted the thread in your group.

You are using another derailment tactic... yet the evidence of who is stalking who is a plenty in you group, where almost every other thread is a response to something written in HoF, or an actual thread linked to PROVE MISANDRY!!!! OMFG!!!!!!!

The thread your former host is so fond of linking to, to prove MISANDRY, OMFG!!!!! was about a woman jailed for miscarrying and a poster in HoF said something to the effect as to this is why she thinks males should be castrated once they hit puberty or something like that. You want to talk about not being able to distinguish a rhetorical, imaginary occurence, being used to make a point about the other side of the spectrum and how this women and other women are treated because of their body parts, well..... It really should not have been that controversial to anyone, including you and your former host, or anyone with both halves of their wits!!!! At any rate..... I've proven here who the surveyor is. Maybe this OP does have a point afterall. but not with anything Freud.... but projection is often a great way to try to win a message board argument. You've been unmasked and so haven't your buddies who wouldn't have anything to talk about in the mens group, if HoF didn't exist.