General Discussion

MH1

(19,156 posts)

22. I'm not the one who's compelled, but I might be the victim of the violent action

Mon Sep 16, 2013, 09:48 AM

Sep 2013

which is done by people who ARE the problem, who were instigated by someone else who IS the problem.

You really think spitting on what someone else cares about is a good way to live? Really?

I don't suppose I'll see you spouting peace or decrying war on any threads here.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Question for DU: If flag burning is "protected speech", isn't book burning also protected? [View all] OmahaBlueDog Sep 2013 OP

You should be able to burn a flag, a book, an effigy, et cetera DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2013 #1

Yes, but... PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #2

That fool can burn any of the things I cited as long as he's not creating a fire hazard./nt DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2013 #7

I agree. There is more than one issue here. PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #11

America gets to allow disrespect to America as a form of protest, because that's inward. MH1 Sep 2013 #3

It's a slippery slope to start prohibiting speech because somebody's feelings might be hurt./nt DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2013 #13

Yes, and it's a slippery slope to start prohibiting speech because someone might be PHYSICALLY hurt. MH1 Sep 2013 #21

There has to be a imminent and immediate threat. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2013 #23

The crux of your post assumes that Mulims and Americans are mutally exclusive groups. Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #14

That's an interesting point. MH1 Sep 2013 #28

Sorry, but your point of view is that point of view which allows anti gay laws.... Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #31

No that's not my point of view, and I'm sorry I bothered with you. MH1 Sep 2013 #39

If the non-violent action of another compells you to take violent action against them... prefunk Sep 2013 #19

I'm not the one who's compelled, but I might be the victim of the violent action MH1 Sep 2013 #22

I was using a rhetorical "you", not talking about you yourself. prefunk Sep 2013 #24

And I was using the rhetorical "I" MH1 Sep 2013 #30

I really have no idea what you are talking about. prefunk Sep 2013 #35

Violence is not an acceptable response to non-violence. Where do I say otherwise? MH1 Sep 2013 #36

I fail to see how (in this country, at least) resorting to violence over the burning of a book prefunk Sep 2013 #40

People who take violent action are wholly resposible for their own violence. Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #25

I just f*cking replied to you. Sheesh. MH1 Sep 2013 #29

And that as I said, explains your entire self to me. Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #33

Of course disrespecting other people is a horrible way to live one's life. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2013 #27

There were a couple issues that Jones was flirting with... Not Me Sep 2013 #4

He's not being charged with book burning,which sufrommich Sep 2013 #5

Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #6

He wasn't arrested for a tail light maddezmom Sep 2013 #12

Seriously? Its against the law to drive a vehicle soaked sufrommich Sep 2013 #15

It would be akin DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2013 #18

Imagine women's-rights-activists torching a truckload of bras. DetlefK Sep 2013 #8

He wasn't arrested for BURNING the Qurans csziggy Sep 2013 #9

Yes, so is stupid. pintobean Sep 2013 #10

So he was arrested for creating a hazard, not for book burning? gollygee Sep 2013 #16

Book burning is protected, but public fire hazards are not. Jones was not arrested for Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #17

Are you asking me about the law, LWolf Sep 2013 #20

So dance is never expression to be protected because it is not verbal? Visual arts? Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #26

There are unlimited ways to express one's self. LWolf Sep 2013 #41

Free speech means even if I don't like it it goes. hobbit709 Sep 2013 #32

book burning is protected; driving around with kerosene-soaked books is not. charlie and algernon Sep 2013 #34

Yes, but the dumb ass pastor had flaaamble materials he was transporting gopiscrap Sep 2013 #37

a speech element doesn't make otherwise criminal behavior legal nt geek tragedy Sep 2013 #38

Laws governing burning and similar hazards are common struggle4progress Sep 2013 #42