General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Think about this when you see someone here calling another a pedophile or rapist apologist or [View all]LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Hopefully you were suggesting she edit it because you saw it as wrong and not because you were afraid others would see it. Of course, if you go back and read your original reply to me in this thread, it does appear that you weren't referring to yourself, as I hadn't mentioned you, but to the context. For some reason you saw something wrong with it at the time but are now telling me to "do you read?", that doesn't make any sense. Why did you see a problem with it originally, yet are now telling me I can't read when I'm pointing out that it's wrong? Your replies don't have any consistency.
I suppose that puts you ahead of everyone who read it and saw nothing wrong with it, which appears to be your own forum hosts and everyone else in that thread.
The truth is that I'm not outraged by it. I'm only highlighting it to show how ridiculous it is for a gender equality group to have hosts who see nothing wrong with rhetorically suggesting boys should be castrated at puberty. Watching Bean try to explain that one is one of the most pathetic displays I've ever seen at DU.