General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Largest Gun Study Ever: More Guns, More Murder [View all]MicaelS
(8,747 posts)The NRA didn't become as powerful as it is today (The 1977 Cincinnati Revolt) until Gun Prohibition Advocates started advocating the Prohibition of Handguns, then Semi-Automatics, and for some Gun Prohibition Advocates, all guns. Gun Prohibition Advocates sowed the wind, and reaped the whirlwind. Gun Prohibition Advocates have no one to blame but themselves. You do not attempt to take people rights and freedoms away, and then claim it's their fault when they react.
Another factor contributing to the change in the NRA was the realization that the "Fudds" (those who believe the only purpose of owning guns was to hunt) would be perfectly willing to sell out other guns owners as long as they were allowed to keep their hunting guns. And the non-hunters were not about to let themselves be sold out.
The rise of various organizations seeking to strictly limit or ban handguns.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_Campaign
Also involved was Nelson T. (Pete) Shields III whose son, Nelson 4th, was shot and killed in San Francisco in 1975, a victim in a series of racially motivated killings of whites by four blacks that came to be known as the Zebra killings.
"We'll take one step at a time, and the first is necessarily - given the political realities - very modest. We'll have to start working again to strengthen the law, and then again to strengthen the next law and again and again. Our ultimate goal, total control of handguns, is going to take time. The first problem is to slow down production and sales. Next is to get registration. The final problem is to make possession of all handguns and ammunition (with a few exceptions) totally illegal."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coalition_to_Stop_Gun_Violence