Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rising Left in the Democratic Party Killed Larry Summer’s Fed Chair Chances [View all]Melinda
(5,465 posts)53. Link to article "Rise of the new left". It's long, but worth every moment!
The Rise of the New left
^^^THIS^^^ gives me hope. The entire article is long, but a great read. I hope it lifts you up too.
Maybe Bill de Blasio got lucky. Maybe he only won because he cut a sweet ad featuring his biracial son. Or because his rivals were either spectacularly boring, spectacularly pathological, or running for Michael Bloombergs fourth term. But I dont think so. The deeper you look, the stronger the evidence that de Blasios victory is an omen of what may become the defining story of Americas next political era: the challenge, to both parties, from the left. Its a challenge Hillary Clinton should start worrying about now.
-snip-
The argument between the children of Reagan and the children of Clinton is fierce, but ideologically, it tilts toward the right. Even after the financial crisis, the Clinton Democrats who lead their party dont want to nationalize the banks, institute a single-payer health-care system, raise the top tax rate back to its pre-Reagan high, stop negotiating free-trade deals, launch a war on poverty, or appoint labor leaders rather than Wall Streeters to top economic posts. They want to regulate capitalism modestly. Their Reaganite Republican adversaries, by contrast, want to deregulate it radically. By pre-Reagan standards, the economic debate is taking place on the conservative side of the field. Butand this is the key point--theres reason to believe that Americas next political generation will challenge those limits in ways that cause the leaders of both parties fits.
Americas youngest adults are called Millennials because the 21st century was dawning as they entered their plastic years. Coming of age in the 21st century is of no inherent political significance. But this calendric shift has coincided with a genuine historical disruption. Compared to their Reagan-Clinton generation elders, Millennials are entering adulthood in an America where government provides much less economic security. And their economic experience in this newly deregulated America has been horrendous. This experience has not produced a common generational outlook. No such thing ever exists. But it is producing a distinct intragenerational argument, one that does not respect the ideological boundaries to which Americans have become accustomed. The Millennials are unlikely to play out their political conflicts between the yard lines Reagan and Clinton set out.
-snip-
The argument between the children of Reagan and the children of Clinton is fierce, but ideologically, it tilts toward the right. Even after the financial crisis, the Clinton Democrats who lead their party dont want to nationalize the banks, institute a single-payer health-care system, raise the top tax rate back to its pre-Reagan high, stop negotiating free-trade deals, launch a war on poverty, or appoint labor leaders rather than Wall Streeters to top economic posts. They want to regulate capitalism modestly. Their Reaganite Republican adversaries, by contrast, want to deregulate it radically. By pre-Reagan standards, the economic debate is taking place on the conservative side of the field. Butand this is the key point--theres reason to believe that Americas next political generation will challenge those limits in ways that cause the leaders of both parties fits.
Americas youngest adults are called Millennials because the 21st century was dawning as they entered their plastic years. Coming of age in the 21st century is of no inherent political significance. But this calendric shift has coincided with a genuine historical disruption. Compared to their Reagan-Clinton generation elders, Millennials are entering adulthood in an America where government provides much less economic security. And their economic experience in this newly deregulated America has been horrendous. This experience has not produced a common generational outlook. No such thing ever exists. But it is producing a distinct intragenerational argument, one that does not respect the ideological boundaries to which Americans have become accustomed. The Millennials are unlikely to play out their political conflicts between the yard lines Reagan and Clinton set out.
^^^THIS^^^ gives me hope. The entire article is long, but a great read. I hope it lifts you up too.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Rising Left in the Democratic Party Killed Larry Summer’s Fed Chair Chances [View all]
WilliamPitt
Sep 2013
OP
"Beinhart is selling a bag of goods." Is that your argument against what he
rhett o rick
Sep 2013
#67
realistic danger may be that a lefty challenger forces her into positions that hurt her in the GE
DJ13
Sep 2013
#103
It's your time! Rest assured, the left of a certain age have your back! Stay involved...
Melinda
Sep 2013
#63
I don't know who wrote this, but I wish I could hand out a flyer to everyone in your generation...
Caretha
Sep 2013
#71
"Ironically, Warren may be the political loser in Summers’s decision to drop out"
MNBrewer
Sep 2013
#13
he offically withdrew his name from consideration for something he was not be considered for.
KG
Sep 2013
#33
After the 2010 Congressional losses, Obama said "I get it." Now, with Summers, he gets it?
AnotherMcIntosh
Sep 2013
#21
"And regulators who coddle Wall Street have to worry more about becoming props...
magical thyme
Sep 2013
#27
They are, except for those who always claim to be further left than whoever they're talking to.
tridim
Sep 2013
#52
a lot of people do make that conflation--but that's only possible because the left's been purged
MisterP
Sep 2013
#54
I know that there's no shortness of hand wringing over something that never happened
Renew Deal
Sep 2013
#106
What's sad is the Democrats need to get consulted on how to be Liberal these days.
Spitfire of ATJ
Sep 2013
#75
If: "The party still relies on the financial services industry to help fund its campaigns,
Zorra
Sep 2013
#104
There are people within or close to the Democratic Party's leadership who are terrified...
YoungDemCA
Sep 2013
#120