General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: DU should win a journalism award! Again the images of the shooter were posted hours before [View all]Tommy_Carcetti
(44,371 posts)...even if you qualify the language as "maybe" or "perhaps".
I'm telling you now, if I shared a similar name or identification to someone accused of committing a horrible crime, and someone on some board pulled up my name and started speculating that I was the person committing said acts, I would not take to it kindly. And I'm sure neither would you.
It's classic false light defamation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_light
"False light differs from defamation primarily in being intended "to protect the plaintiff's mental or emotional well-being" rather than protect a plaintiff's reputation as is the case with the tort of defamation[1] and in being about the impression created rather than being about true or false. If a publication of information is false, then a tort of defamation might have occurred. If that communication is not technically false but is still misleading then a tort of false light might have occurred.[1]"