General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: HE'S GONNA CUT SS!!!! (didn't happen) HE'S GONNA INVADE SYRIA!!! (didn't happen) HE'S GONNA NOMINATE [View all]markpkessinger
(8,930 posts). . . The entire post was about trying to portray those of us who were concerned about these various issues, and who spoke up LOUDLY, as being hysterical, hair-on-fire, panic-mongers. But you know, you can't have it both ways. If, in fact, the President "listens to the left," as you suggest, then it's a damned good thing some of us did raise our voices when we did. If, on the other hand, his handling of each of these various issues was part of some brilliant, eleven-dimensional chess strategy, then no, he isn't listening to the left at all, but is rather following his own (amazingly telepathic and clairvoyant) strategy. Which is it?
And I would add also that when it first came to light that Summers was under serious consideration, the attitude of folks in your camp was to dismiss the concern, saying, "Summers hasn't been formally nominated yet." IN other words, folks like you were telling us to STFU even then. If we had, Summers would likely now be the nominee. As I said to someone at the time, I preferred not to wait until his nomination was a fait accompli.