General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Legal Loophole Allows New Belt-Fed AR-15 That Sprays Bullets Like a Machine Gun [View all]Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)I think some of here have found a punching bag in the personages of some gun-owners, and have done their dead-level best to associate the large majority of gun-owners -- of which DU gun-owners are a part -- with their punching bag. And believe me, great latitude is given those who want to talk "penis, paranoia", and symbolic puke about fellow DUers. This underwrites many of the posts here. But the folks who support 2A here are not the sort to back off or be shamed; in fact, some will double down.
I don't like seeing violence, but that gimmick bump "discovery" (it's hardly a technology) has been around for a while. Personally, I don't object to claasification of accessories which build-in that practice as falling under the rubric of machine guns. Trouble is, even a conventional semi-auto might be made to operate by bump fire. How is the practice regulated? And I've never seen this hat & cane gun useage in any crime.
Both sides in this debate will face sober questions in a few years when "firearms" no longer use fire, but instead electricity, and are "printed."