General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Summers wasn't the nominee." [View all]jazzimov
(1,456 posts)because I thought at the time that it was well thought-out and well-researched. Now, I am beginning to question that.
Yes, I am beginning to question your previous writings based on the BS that I see reflected in your current writings.
To the Will Pitt I remember, the simple distinction that Summers was NOT a nominee would have been a BIG DEAL - and he would have written about it EXTENSIVELY.
To the Will Pitt I remember, the fact that today's market reacted so POSITIVELY to Summer's withdrawal would have sent up a red flag. The Will Pitt I remember would have written extensively about WHY the market that so many of us were afraid Summers would faovr were so GLAD that he didn't get the nomination (whoops! There's that word again!)
I know that you're a new Daddy, and that you don't have time or sleep to be as prolific as you were before. But, surely, having a baby didn't affect your BRAIN. Unless I start seeing your posts saying "gaa-gaa goo-goo". Although, come to think of it, that's what your posts have become.
What happened to you, Will? I thought you were smarter than you've been expressing lately.