General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm sorry but the Democratic Party is not doing its job. [View all]Festivito
(13,891 posts)Limitations that suddenly go away in April of 2004 under the W* Bush administration, six months before the presidential election. Making a boon time for the banks that would then cataclysmically fail in a few years.
But, all you're interested in is that a Democrat signed the bill saying nice things about himself even though his signature given or not would mean no difference. NO DIFFERENCE.
What? He's supposed to rail against himself in his own signing statement? No. He does, within the statement, change tone and notes the limitations that are needed for this bill.
The it is Glass-Steagal and don't look at the limitations being overturned behind the media curtain is RW smokescreen crapola.
I'd like to see Glass-Steagal put back into law, but not as much as I'd like to see the banks returning to having their 10% rule back.
(Sorry it takes so long for me to respond to these things. I work too much -- to afford time to be on DU.)
But, I will not abide this blame the Democrat game.