Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A (DU) minority view on guns. [View all]G_j
(40,569 posts)87. Chemical weapons don't kill people...
that's why responsible people need them to keep us all safe..
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
166 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Right, thats why European nations have such high gun related deaths too...
Katashi_itto
Sep 2013
#17
We've tried the way of the gun nut shitheads...it is a manifest failure
alcibiades_mystery
Sep 2013
#59
Yeah, it's no fun when someone lumps you in with a group you have nothing to do with,
Bazinga
Sep 2013
#54
I reserve the gunnut label for those who align themselves with the NRA. Those who block and
morningfog
Sep 2013
#56
Problem is, "sensible gun reform" has become a code phrase for an extreme wish list
derby378
Sep 2013
#118
What is concerning to me is that these are people on the edge whether they use a gun or some other
dkf
Sep 2013
#10
Provide data that indicates more people have been saved through defensive use of weapons
BainsBane
Sep 2013
#36
is it too much ask that gun owners only kill each other and not innocent bystanders? really nt
msongs
Sep 2013
#12
Do you suppose that if such an arrangment were reached, the rest of you
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2013
#24
I disagree - you do not have a right to forms of self-defense that endanger others.
Donald Ian Rankin
Sep 2013
#18
The only appropriate use for some of these guns is to kill as many people as possible and as quickly
Skidmore
Sep 2013
#27
You say "The whole purpose of a gun is to intimidate those who do not have them."
Jenoch
Sep 2013
#109
Not this again. How many times must it be discussed and debunked before this
SlimJimmy
Sep 2013
#141
Since you seem to think we should get Grover Norquist's approval for any policy we advocate...
DanTex
Sep 2013
#95
I observe gun owners abusing their rights: poaching, destroying property, getting drunk and making
Kolesar
Sep 2013
#43
Our *non-gun* homicide rate is higher than many countries' *total* homicide rate.
X_Digger
Sep 2013
#73
except that with cars, rope etc...guns are speciically designed to kill people
gopiscrap
Sep 2013
#77
They were more than willing to push the confiscation myth after these shootings and the elections
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2013
#102
So American people are just more naturally prone to violence than everyone else?
KamaAina
Sep 2013
#101
Every one of these mass shooters was a "legal gun owner" before they went on a rampage.
Erose999
Sep 2013
#108
The point is that the old canard "Only criminals use guns illegally" is a bunch of malarky.
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2013
#130
I don't think its the minority view at all, if it was there would be no guns.
1-Old-Man
Sep 2013
#115
And argue the blatant falsehood that the majority of Democrats are against any gun control measures.
Moses2SandyKoufax
Sep 2013
#139
Argue this question until the end of time. All I know is if guns were completely banned
chelsea0011
Sep 2013
#129
Thank you. So true- they just do not want to be inconvenienced. So selfish, and dishonest...
bettyellen
Sep 2013
#149